PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSPR.L vs. VSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSPR.L vs. VSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSPR.L) and Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSPR.L is traded in GBp, while VSGX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VSGX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSPR.L achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly lower than VSGX's 16.25% return.


XSPR.L

1D
-1.20%
1M
5.92%
YTD
8.65%
6M
11.59%
1Y
13.05%
3Y*
10.38%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
13.87%

VSGX

1D
-0.67%
1M
7.40%
YTD
16.25%
6M
17.93%
1Y
34.20%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSPR.L vs. VSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSPR.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
8.65%14.12%-6.12%16.07%-7.66%18.51%17.88%16.55%-11.19%
VSGX
Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF
16.25%21.45%7.57%9.85%-8.93%8.26%9.69%18.36%-9.35%

Correlation

The correlation between XSPR.L and VSGX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2018

0.40

The correlation between XSPR.L and VSGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSPR.L vs. VSGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSPR.L
VSGX

Basic Materials

98.7%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
9.5%

Communication Services

-

4.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.1%

Energy

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

27.9%

Healthcare

-

9.4%

Industrials

-

9.8%

Real Estate

-

3.2%

Technology

-

23.9%

Utilities

-

0.7%

Basic Materials

XSPR.L
98.7%
VSGX
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XSPR.L
1.3%
VSGX
9.5%

Communication Services

XSPR.L

-

VSGX
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

XSPR.L

-

VSGX
5.1%

Energy

XSPR.L

-

VSGX
0.0%

Financial Services

XSPR.L

-

VSGX
27.9%

Healthcare

XSPR.L

-

VSGX
9.4%

Industrials

XSPR.L

-

VSGX
9.8%

Real Estate

XSPR.L

-

VSGX
3.2%

Technology

XSPR.L

-

VSGX
23.9%

Utilities

XSPR.L

-

VSGX
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSPR.L vs. VSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSPR.L
XSPR.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XSPR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSPR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSPR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XSPR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSPR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

VSGX
VSGX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSPR.L vs. VSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSPR.L) and Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSPR.LVSGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.47

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

3.06

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.44

12.24

-10.81

XSPR.L vs. VSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSPR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the VSGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSPR.L and VSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSPR.LVSGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

2.49

-2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.68

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.56

-0.41

Drawdowns

XSPR.L vs. VSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSPR.L drawdown since its inception was -68.41%, which is greater than VSGX's maximum drawdown of -26.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPR.L and VSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSPR.LVSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.41%

-26.96%

-41.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.78%

-11.22%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-13.31%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.71%

-17.51%

-6.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-0.67%

-3.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.82%

-4.78%

-16.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.06%

2.80%

+6.26%

Volatility

XSPR.L vs. VSGX - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSPR.L) has a higher volatility of 6.37% compared to Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX) at 5.17%. This indicates that XSPR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSPR.LVSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.37%

5.17%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

11.95%

+2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.47%

13.82%

+12.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.23%

13.22%

+10.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.16%

16.10%

+12.06%

XSPR.L vs. VSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSPR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VSGX's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSPR.L vs. VSGX - Dividend Comparison

XSPR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
VSGX
Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF
2.85%3.23%3.10%2.77%2.61%2.49%1.67%2.28%0.38%
XSPR.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSPR.L and VSGX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VSGX is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VSGX is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSPR.L.

XSPR.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VSGX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. XSPR.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while VSGX tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Choice Index.. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSPR.L and 0.12% for VSGX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSPR.L and VSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer