XSPI vs. ACYS
XSPI (NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. XSPI is passively managed, while ACYS is actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSPI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
XSPI vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XSPI
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSPI vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF | 6.43% |
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 2.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSPI and ACYS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSPI vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSPI vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSPI drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPI and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSPI | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -0.63% | -11.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.10% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -0.14% | -2.16% |
Volatility
XSPI vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSPI | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.86% | 3.38% | +14.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 3.38% | +14.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 3.38% | +14.48% |
XSPI vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSPI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSPI vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
XSPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.60% |
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF | 8.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSPI and ACYS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XSPI.
XSPI has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: NEOS Investments and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XSPI and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for XSPI and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer