XSOE vs. GDMN
XSOE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XSOE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. XSOE is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSOE returned 23.36%/yr vs 60.95%/yr for GDMN. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSOE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.
Performance
XSOE vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSOE achieves a 27.99% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -4.13% return.
XSOE
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 9.84%
- YTD
- 27.99%
- 6M
- 30.83%
- 1Y
- 54.87%
- 3Y*
- 23.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
GDMN
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- -4.13%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 76.93%
- 3Y*
- 60.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSOE vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSOE WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 27.99% | 30.05% | 7.02% | 10.28% | -25.83% | 0.82% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | -4.13% | 237.09% | 28.23% | 12.97% | -14.62% | 5.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSOE and GDMN is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021 | 0.41 |
XSOE vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSOE
GDMN
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
XSOE
GDMN
-
Financial Services
XSOE
GDMN
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSOE
GDMN
-
Industrials
XSOE
GDMN
-
Communication Services
XSOE
GDMN
-
Basic Materials
XSOE
GDMN
Healthcare
XSOE
GDMN
-
Consumer Defensive
XSOE
GDMN
-
Energy
XSOE
GDMN
-
Utilities
XSOE
GDMN
-
Real Estate
XSOE
GDMN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSOE vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank
XSOE
GDMN
XSOE vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSOE | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.25 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 1.98 | +2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.84 | 4.68 | +11.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSOE | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | 1.26 | +1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.80 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
XSOE vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSOE drawdown since its inception was -45.23%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSOE and GDMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSOE | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.23% | -52.82% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.31% | -39.03% | +25.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.96% | -39.03% | +19.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -37.06% | +35.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.28% | -18.89% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 16.51% | -13.04% |
Volatility
XSOE vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) is 8.57%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 17.94%. This indicates that XSOE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSOE | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.57% | 17.94% | -9.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.24% | 51.79% | -34.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.77% | 61.32% | -41.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 47.59% | -28.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 47.59% | -27.00% |
XSOE vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSOE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSOE vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison
XSOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than GDMN's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 2.82% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSOE WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 1.28% | 1.50% | 1.44% | 1.78% | 2.53% | 1.36% | 1.02% | 2.01% | 1.56% | 0.65% | 1.43% | 3.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSOE and GDMN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDMN has higher volatility (17.94%) compared to XSOE (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSOE dropped -45.23% vs GDMN's -52.82%.
On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 60.95% vs 23.36% for XSOE. On fees, XSOE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, XSOE has been the lower-risk option at 8.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 60.95% return vs 23.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSOE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.
GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.28% for XSOE.
XSOE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for XSOE and 0.45% for GDMN.
XSOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSOE and GDMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer