PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSOE vs. EEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSOE vs. EEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XSOE having a 19.08% return and EEM slightly lower at 18.51%. Over the past 10 years, XSOE has outperformed EEM with an annualized return of 9.52%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.45% annualized return.


XSOE

1D
-3.45%
1M
-4.00%
6M
12.89%
YTD
19.08%
1Y
36.58%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
9.52%

EEM

1D
-3.59%
1M
-4.49%
6M
11.90%
YTD
18.51%
1Y
36.27%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
8.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSOE vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSOE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
19.08%30.05%7.02%10.28%-25.83%-5.92%28.61%24.81%-18.60%49.23%
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
18.51%33.98%6.49%8.95%-20.56%-3.63%17.02%18.22%-15.31%37.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XSOE and EEM is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014

0.88

The correlation between XSOE and EEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.88 (all time) to 0.99 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSOE vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSOE
EEM

Technology

43.9%
44.3%

Financial Services

14.1%
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
8.3%

Industrials

8.6%
6.6%

Communication Services

6.1%
6.0%

Basic Materials

4.8%
5.9%

Healthcare

3.9%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
2.5%

Energy

1.6%
3.4%

Utilities

1.3%
1.8%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.0%

Technology

XSOE
43.9%
EEM
44.3%

Financial Services

XSOE
14.1%
EEM
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XSOE
11.3%
EEM
8.3%

Industrials

XSOE
8.6%
EEM
6.6%

Communication Services

XSOE
6.1%
EEM
6.0%

Basic Materials

XSOE
4.8%
EEM
5.9%

Healthcare

XSOE
3.9%
EEM
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

XSOE
3.4%
EEM
2.5%

Energy

XSOE
1.6%
EEM
3.4%

Utilities

XSOE
1.3%
EEM
1.8%

Real Estate

XSOE
0.9%
EEM
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSOE vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSOE
XSOE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
XSOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSOE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XSOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSOE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSOE vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSOEEEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

2.69

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

9.20

+0.23

XSOE vs. EEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSOE Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the EEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSOE and EEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSOE vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSOE drawdown since its inception was -45.23%, smaller than the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSOE and EEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSOEEEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.23%

-66.43%

+21.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.31%

-13.52%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.96%

-17.29%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.51%

-35.70%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.23%

-39.82%

-5.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.09%

-9.42%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.17%

-15.97%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

3.95%

-0.06%

Volatility

XSOE vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) have volatilities of 11.36% and 11.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSOEEEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.36%

11.27%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.46%

21.57%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.43%

23.57%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.20%

19.71%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.86%

20.70%

+0.16%

XSOE vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSOE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSOE vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison

XSOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than EEM's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1.73%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
XSOE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
1.64%1.50%1.44%1.78%2.53%1.36%1.02%2.01%1.56%0.65%1.43%3.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XSOE and EEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XSOE has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to EEM (11.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSOE dropped -45.23% vs EEM's -66.43%.

On 10-year performance, XSOE leads with 9.52% vs 8.45% for EEM. On fees, XSOE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSOE has performed better with a 9.52% return vs 8.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSOE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

EEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.64% for XSOE.

XSOE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. XSOE tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for XSOE and 0.72% for EEM.

XSOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSOE and EEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer