XSNR.L vs. XCX5.L
XSNR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and XCX5.L (Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XSNR.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XCX5.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSNR.L returned 12.04%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for XCX5.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSNR.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XCX5.L.
Performance
XSNR.L vs. XCX5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSNR.L achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than XCX5.L's -12.70% return. Over the past 10 years, XSNR.L has outperformed XCX5.L with an annualized return of 12.04%, while XCX5.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.44% annualized return.
XSNR.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 17.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.21%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.04%
XCX5.L
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -12.70%
- 6M
- -12.76%
- 1Y
- -12.07%
- 3Y*
- 2.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
XSNR.L vs. XCX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSNR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 7.81% | 20.64% | 5.20% | 21.57% | -14.54% | 21.19% | 12.17% | 27.37% | -12.09% | 21.42% |
XCX5.L Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -12.70% | -5.16% | 11.92% | 12.56% | 2.33% | 26.19% | 9.49% | 2.58% | -3.56% | 24.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSNR.L and XCX5.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010 | 0.43 |
The correlation between XSNR.L and XCX5.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSNR.L vs. XCX5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSNR.L
XCX5.L
Industrials
Communication Services
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
XSNR.L
XCX5.L
Communication Services
XSNR.L
XCX5.L
Financial Services
XSNR.L
XCX5.L
Basic Materials
XSNR.L
XCX5.L
Consumer Defensive
XSNR.L
XCX5.L
Technology
XSNR.L
XCX5.L
Consumer Cyclical
XSNR.L
XCX5.L
Energy
XSNR.L
XCX5.L
Healthcare
XSNR.L
-
XCX5.L
Real Estate
XSNR.L
-
XCX5.L
Utilities
XSNR.L
-
XCX5.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSNR.L vs. XCX5.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSNR.L
XCX5.L
XSNR.L vs. XCX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSNR.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.89 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | -0.60 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.33 | -1.37 | +5.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSNR.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | -0.76 | +1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.26 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.37 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.23 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
XSNR.L vs. XCX5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSNR.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, smaller than the maximum XCX5.L drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSNR.L and XCX5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSNR.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.07% | -41.74% | +5.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -19.88% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.10% | -26.47% | +9.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.20% | -26.47% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | -37.35% | +1.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.35% | -23.06% | +19.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -11.04% | +4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 8.81% | -4.76% |
Volatility
XSNR.L vs. XCX5.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) have volatilities of 6.25% and 6.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSNR.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.25% | 6.39% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.20% | 13.26% | +1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.47% | 15.78% | +2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 15.92% | +2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 19.89% | -1.00% |
XSNR.L vs. XCX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSNR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XCX5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSNR.L vs. XCX5.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSNR.L nor XCX5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XSNR.L and XCX5.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSNR.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSNR.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XCX5.L.
XSNR.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XCX5.L is Asia Pacific Equities. XSNR.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XCX5.L tracks MSCI India NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSNR.L and 0.75% for XCX5.L.
Find the right allocation for XSNR.L and XCX5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer