XSNR.L vs. UC46.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XSNR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and UC46.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - XSNR.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while UC46.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSNR.L returned 12.04%/yr vs 15.32%/yr for UC46.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSNR.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for UC46.L.

Performance

XSNR.L vs. UC46.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC46.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSNR.L achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than UC46.L's 13.69% return. Over the past 10 years, XSNR.L has underperformed UC46.L with an annualized return of 12.04%, while UC46.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.

XSNR.L

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -0.26%
• YTD: 7.81%
• 6M: 9.55%
• 1Y: 17.56%
• 3Y*: 14.21%
• 5Y*: 9.16%
• 10Y*: 12.04%

UC46.L

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 8.42%
• YTD: 13.69%
• 6M: 12.83%
• 1Y: 26.84%
• 3Y*: 16.58%
• 5Y*: 12.52%
• 10Y*: 15.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSNR.L vs. UC46.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XSNR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C	7.81%	20.64%	5.20%	21.57%	-14.54%	21.19%	12.17%	27.37%	-12.09%	21.42%
UC46.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	13.69%	2.79%	21.13%	25.01%	-16.49%	32.62%	18.59%	25.18%	0.87%	11.39%

Correlation

The correlation between XSNR.L and UC46.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2013	0.67

The correlation between XSNR.L and UC46.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSNR.L vs. UC46.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XSNR.L	UC46.L
Industrials	97.5%	9.9%
Communication Services	3.0%	3.6%
Financial Services	1.6%	12.0%
Basic Materials	0.7%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	5.0%
Technology	0.5%	44.2%
Consumer Cyclical	0.5%	11.1%
Energy	0.3%	-
Healthcare	-	9.1%
Real Estate	-	2.8%
Utilities	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

XSNR.L vs. UC46.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSNR.L

XSNR.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
XSNR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
XSNR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
XSNR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 27
XSNR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
XSNR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 30

UC46.L

UC46.L Risk / Return Rank: 62
UC46.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
UC46.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
UC46.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
UC46.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
UC46.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSNR.L vs. UC46.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC46.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XSNR.L	UC46.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	2.21	-1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	3.05	-1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.40	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	2.73	-1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.33	8.86	-4.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSNR.L vs. UC46.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSNR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the UC46.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSNR.L and UC46.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XSNR.L	UC46.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	2.21	-1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.80	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.94	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.91	-0.27

Drawdowns

XSNR.L vs. UC46.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSNR.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, which is greater than UC46.L's maximum drawdown of -25.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSNR.L and UC46.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSNR.L	UC46.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.07%	-25.03%	-11.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.30%	-9.80%	-4.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.10%	-22.59%	+5.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.20%	-23.06%	-4.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.07%	-25.03%	-11.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.35%	-0.59%	-2.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.09%	-4.64%	-1.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.05%	3.02%	+1.03%

Volatility

XSNR.L vs. UC46.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC46.L) at 3.91%. This indicates that XSNR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC46.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSNR.L	UC46.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.25%	3.91%	+2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.20%	8.89%	+6.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.47%	12.11%	+6.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.87%	15.74%	+3.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.89%	16.29%	+2.60%

XSNR.L vs. UC46.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSNR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UC46.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XSNR.L vs. UC46.L - Dividend Comparison

XSNR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC46.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UC46.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	0.42%	0.80%	0.72%	0.75%	0.86%	0.64%	0.87%	1.03%	1.02%	1.23%	1.18%	1.24%
XSNR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSNR.L and UC46.L in my portfolio?

XSNR.L and UC46.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XSNR.L or UC46.L?

On fees, XSNR.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSNR.L or UC46.L?

XSNR.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for UC46.L.

What is the main difference between XSNR.L and UC46.L?

XSNR.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while UC46.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. XSNR.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while UC46.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSNR.L and 0.22% for UC46.L.