PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC46.L vs. HIUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC46.L vs. HIUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC46.L) and HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (HIUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UC46.L is traded in GBp, while HIUS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HIUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC46.L achieves a 13.69% return, which is significantly lower than HIUS.L's 27.34% return.


UC46.L

1D
-0.59%
1M
8.42%
YTD
13.69%
6M
12.83%
1Y
26.84%
3Y*
16.58%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
15.32%

HIUS.L

1D
-0.76%
1M
14.96%
YTD
27.34%
6M
27.08%
1Y
49.89%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC46.L vs. HIUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UC46.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
13.69%2.79%21.13%25.01%-4.35%
HIUS.L
HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
27.34%10.31%9.54%23.06%-3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between UC46.L and HIUS.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2022

0.90

The correlation between UC46.L and HIUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC46.L vs. HIUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC46.L
UC46.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
UC46.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC46.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC46.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
UC46.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC46.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

HIUS.L
HIUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HIUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HIUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC46.L vs. HIUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC46.L) and HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (HIUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UC46.LHIUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.60

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

7.20

-4.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

20.58

-11.72

UC46.L vs. HIUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC46.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is lower than the HIUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC46.L and HIUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UC46.LHIUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

3.44

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

1.18

-0.26

Drawdowns

UC46.L vs. HIUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC46.L drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, roughly equal to the maximum HIUS.L drawdown of -25.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC46.L and HIUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC46.LHIUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.03%

-25.20%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

-6.86%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.59%

-25.20%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.76%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-3.87%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.41%

+0.61%

Volatility

UC46.L vs. HIUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC46.L) is 3.91%, while HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (HIUS.L) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that UC46.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC46.LHIUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

5.46%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.89%

10.84%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

14.36%

-2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.74%

15.67%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

15.67%

+0.62%

UC46.L vs. HIUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC46.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than HIUS.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

UC46.L vs. HIUS.L - Dividend Comparison

UC46.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while HIUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIUS.L
HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC46.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.42%0.80%0.72%0.75%0.86%0.64%0.87%1.03%1.02%1.23%1.18%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, UC46.L and HIUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, UC46.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC46.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HIUS.L.

UC46.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while HIUS.L tracks MSCI USA Islamic ESG Universal Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for UC46.L and 0.30% for HIUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC46.L and HIUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer