XSMO vs. SOXQ
XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSMO returned 25.70%/yr vs 59.09%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSMO charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
XSMO vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 23.45% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 92.48% return.
XSMO
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 23.45%
- 6M
- 21.12%
- 1Y
- 35.59%
- 3Y*
- 25.70%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 14.63%
SOXQ
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- 24.08%
- YTD
- 92.48%
- 6M
- 89.00%
- 1Y
- 171.59%
- 3Y*
- 59.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSMO vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 23.45% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 4.90% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 92.48% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSMO and SOXQ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.65 |
The correlation between XSMO and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSMO vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSMO
SOXQ
Technology
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
XSMO
SOXQ
Industrials
XSMO
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
XSMO
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
XSMO
SOXQ
Consumer Cyclical
XSMO
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
XSMO
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
XSMO
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
XSMO
SOXQ
-
Utilities
XSMO
SOXQ
-
Energy
XSMO
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
XSMO
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSMO vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
XSMO
SOXQ
XSMO vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSMO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.69 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 11.08 | -7.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.74 | 42.47 | -28.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSMO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 5.11 | -3.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.96 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
XSMO vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSMO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -46.01% | -12.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -15.59% | +6.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -39.36% | +14.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -2.15% | +1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.13% | -12.95% | +1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 4.06% | -1.46% |
Volatility
XSMO vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) is 6.12%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.55%. This indicates that XSMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSMO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 13.55% | -7.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.15% | 26.81% | -12.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.76% | 33.80% | -15.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 36.38% | -13.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.12% | 36.38% | -12.26% |
XSMO vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSMO vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.52% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSMO and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.55%) compared to XSMO (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.09% vs 25.70% for XSMO. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XSMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.09% return vs 25.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for XSMO.
XSMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
XSMO is categorized as Momentum, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for XSMO and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.11 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSMO and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer