XSMO vs. JMSIX
XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) and JMSIX (JPMorgan Income Fund) are both funds - XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while JMSIX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by JPMorgan. Over the past 10 years, XSMO returned 15.17%/yr vs 3.97%/yr for JMSIX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSMO charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JMSIX.
Performance
XSMO vs. JMSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 24.80% return, which is significantly higher than JMSIX's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, XSMO has outperformed JMSIX with an annualized return of 15.17%, while JMSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.97% annualized return.
XSMO
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- 24.80%
- 6M
- 20.56%
- 1Y
- 35.19%
- 3Y*
- 24.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.65%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
JMSIX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.76%
- 10Y*
- 3.97%
XSMO vs. JMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 24.80% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 21.96% | 28.65% | -3.44% | 23.95% |
JMSIX JPMorgan Income Fund | 1.23% | 7.68% | 7.78% | 6.14% | -8.24% | 3.59% | 3.07% | 11.82% | 1.03% | 6.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSMO and JMSIX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSMO vs. JMSIX — Risk / Return Rank
XSMO
JMSIX
XSMO vs. JMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSMO | JMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.60 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 3.51 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.44 | 14.54 | -1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSMO vs. JMSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than JMSIX's maximum drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and JMSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSMO | JMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -18.40% | -39.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -1.62% | -7.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -2.31% | -22.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.62% | -11.39% | -18.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.39% | -18.40% | -20.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.12% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -2.56% | -8.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 0.39% | +2.24% |
Volatility
XSMO vs. JMSIX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) at 0.79%. This indicates that XSMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSMO | JMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 0.79% | +6.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.99% | 1.89% | +13.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.42% | 2.52% | +16.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 3.73% | +18.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 3.87% | +20.28% |
XSMO vs. JMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than JMSIX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSMO vs. JMSIX - Dividend Comparison
XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than JMSIX's 6.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMSIX JPMorgan Income Fund | 6.03% | 5.95% | 5.78% | 4.43% | 4.78% | 4.00% | 4.95% | 5.10% | 5.43% | 5.42% | 0.46% | 0.00% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.52% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSMO and JMSIX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSMO has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to JMSIX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs JMSIX's -18.40%.
JMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSMO and JMSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer