PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLV vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSLV vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLV achieves a 11.98% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 22.90% return. Over the past 10 years, XSLV has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 6.15%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.13% annualized return.


XSLV

1D
1.45%
1M
3.35%
YTD
11.98%
6M
11.04%
1Y
15.35%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*
6.15%

XMMO

1D
-2.42%
1M
3.07%
YTD
22.90%
6M
20.25%
1Y
35.75%
3Y*
31.04%
5Y*
15.91%
10Y*
20.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLV vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
11.98%0.31%9.81%1.34%-11.83%29.34%-17.40%22.35%-5.41%8.57%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
22.90%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLV and XMMO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2013

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between XSLV and XMMO has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XSLV vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSLV
XMMO

Financial Services

43.2%
2.5%

Real Estate

28.5%
5.4%

Utilities

9.1%
5.6%

Industrials

7.2%
41.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
2.7%

Basic Materials

2.7%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
2.2%

Healthcare

1.5%
6.3%

Communication Services

1.1%
1.3%

Technology

0.9%
19.2%

Energy

0.8%
6.5%

Financial Services

XSLV
43.2%
XMMO
2.5%

Real Estate

XSLV
28.5%
XMMO
5.4%

Utilities

XSLV
9.1%
XMMO
5.6%

Industrials

XSLV
7.2%
XMMO
41.5%

Consumer Defensive

XSLV
3.9%
XMMO
2.7%

Basic Materials

XSLV
2.7%
XMMO
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XSLV
2.3%
XMMO
2.2%

Healthcare

XSLV
1.5%
XMMO
6.3%

Communication Services

XSLV
1.1%
XMMO
1.3%

Technology

XSLV
0.9%
XMMO
19.2%

Energy

XSLV
0.8%
XMMO
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSLV vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLV
XSLV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLV vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSLVXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.32

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

4.31

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.87

17.07

-11.19

XSLV vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLV and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSLV vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLV drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLV and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLVXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.34%

-55.37%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-8.34%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.35%

-24.93%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-27.91%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.34%

-36.74%

-7.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.42%

+2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.26%

-9.43%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.10%

+0.52%

Volatility

XSLV vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) is 4.59%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 8.50%. This indicates that XSLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSLVXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

8.50%

-3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

16.79%

-7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

19.94%

-6.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

21.65%

-4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

22.33%

-2.39%

XSLV vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSLV vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

XSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than XMMO's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.57%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
2.15%2.14%2.55%2.35%2.78%1.05%2.49%2.43%2.75%1.87%1.96%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSLV and XMMO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to XSLV (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSLV dropped -44.34% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 20.13% vs 6.15% for XSLV. On fees, XSLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XSLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 20.13% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

XSLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.57% for XMMO.

XSLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while XMMO is Momentum. XSLV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XSLV and 0.35% for XMMO.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSLV and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer