XSLV vs. XMMO
XSLV (Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSLV returned 5.44%/yr vs 19.73%/yr for XMMO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
XSLV vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSLV achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, XSLV has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 5.44%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.
XSLV
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 6.15%
- 6M
- 6.31%
- 1Y
- 9.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 23.73%
- 6M
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 36.97%
- 3Y*
- 32.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
XSLV vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSLV Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF | 6.15% | 0.31% | 9.81% | 1.34% | -11.83% | 29.34% | -17.40% | 22.35% | -5.41% | 8.57% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 23.73% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSLV and XMMO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2013 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XSLV and XMMO has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XSLV vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSLV
XMMO
Financial Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
XSLV
XMMO
Real Estate
XSLV
XMMO
Utilities
XSLV
XMMO
Industrials
XSLV
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
XSLV
XMMO
Healthcare
XSLV
XMMO
Technology
XSLV
XMMO
Basic Materials
XSLV
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
XSLV
XMMO
Communication Services
XSLV
XMMO
Energy
XSLV
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSLV vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
XSLV
XMMO
XSLV vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSLV | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 1.99 | -1.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 2.77 | -1.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.35 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 4.45 | -3.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 18.21 | -14.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSLV | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 1.99 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.78 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.89 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.58 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
XSLV vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSLV drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLV and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSLV | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.34% | -55.37% | +11.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.46% | -8.34% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.35% | -24.93% | +6.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.72% | -27.91% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.34% | -36.74% | -7.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | 0.00% | -2.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -9.45% | +2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 2.04% | +0.59% |
Volatility
XSLV vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) is 3.92%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that XSLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSLV | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 7.82% | -3.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.94% | 15.54% | -6.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 18.71% | -5.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 21.45% | -4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 22.27% | -2.34% |
XSLV vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSLV vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
XSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
XSLV Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF | 2.61% | 2.14% | 2.55% | 2.35% | 2.78% | 1.05% | 2.49% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 1.87% | 1.96% | 2.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSLV and XMMO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to XSLV (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSLV dropped -44.34% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.73% vs 5.44% for XSLV. On fees, XSLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XSLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 5.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
XSLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.
XSLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while XMMO is Momentum. XSLV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XSLV and 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSLV and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer