XSLV vs. TAIL
XSLV (Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF) and TAIL (Cambria Tail Risk ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. XSLV is passively managed, while TAIL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSLV returned 2.94%/yr vs -8.38%/yr for TAIL. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. XSLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TAIL.
Performance
XSLV vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSLV achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly higher than TAIL's -6.17% return.
XSLV
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 6.15%
- 6M
- 6.31%
- 1Y
- 9.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
TAIL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- -6.17%
- 6M
- -7.55%
- 1Y
- -8.73%
- 3Y*
- -5.76%
- 5Y*
- -8.38%
- 10Y*
- —
XSLV vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSLV Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF | 6.15% | 0.31% | 9.81% | 1.34% | -11.83% | 29.34% | -17.40% | 22.35% | -5.41% | 5.64% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | -6.17% | 5.48% | -9.62% | -13.29% | -13.13% | -12.81% | 6.91% | -14.27% | 2.85% | -7.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSLV and TAIL is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | -0.48 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between XSLV and TAIL has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.48 to -0.17, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
XSLV vs. TAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSLV
TAIL
Financial Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
XSLV
TAIL
Real Estate
XSLV
TAIL
Utilities
XSLV
TAIL
Industrials
XSLV
TAIL
Consumer Defensive
XSLV
TAIL
Healthcare
XSLV
TAIL
Technology
XSLV
TAIL
Basic Materials
XSLV
TAIL
Consumer Cyclical
XSLV
TAIL
Communication Services
XSLV
TAIL
Energy
XSLV
TAIL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSLV vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank
XSLV
TAIL
XSLV vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSLV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.83 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | -0.80 | +2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | -2.01 | +5.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSLV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | -1.03 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | -0.57 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | -0.48 | +0.89 |
Drawdowns
XSLV vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSLV drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLV and TAIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSLV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.34% | -52.36% | +8.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.46% | -10.95% | +3.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.35% | -20.65% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.72% | -38.44% | +13.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -51.56% | +48.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -29.12% | +21.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 4.35% | -1.72% |
Volatility
XSLV vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) at 0.86%. This indicates that XSLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSLV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 0.86% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.94% | 6.45% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 8.51% | +4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 14.90% | +1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 14.94% | +4.99% |
XSLV vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSLV vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison
XSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than TAIL's 3.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | 3.49% | 2.88% | 3.48% | 3.74% | 1.50% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSLV Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF | 2.61% | 2.14% | 2.55% | 2.35% | 2.78% | 1.05% | 2.49% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 1.87% | 1.96% | 2.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSLV and TAIL have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSLV has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to TAIL (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSLV dropped -44.34% vs TAIL's -52.36%.
On 5-year performance, XSLV leads with 2.94% vs -8.38% for TAIL. On fees, XSLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XSLV has performed better with a 2.94% return vs -8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TAIL.
TAIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.61% for XSLV.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XSLV and 0.59% for TAIL.
XSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSLV and TAIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer