PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLV vs. TAIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSLV vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLV achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly higher than TAIL's -6.17% return.


XSLV

1D
-1.47%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
6.15%
6M
6.31%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
5.44%

TAIL

1D
-0.05%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
-6.17%
6M
-7.55%
1Y
-8.73%
3Y*
-5.76%
5Y*
-8.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLV vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
6.15%0.31%9.81%1.34%-11.83%29.34%-17.40%22.35%-5.41%5.64%
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
-6.17%5.48%-9.62%-13.29%-13.13%-12.81%6.91%-14.27%2.85%-7.70%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLV and TAIL is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

-0.48

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between XSLV and TAIL has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.48 to -0.17, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

XSLV vs. TAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSLV
TAIL

Financial Services

37.1%
11.8%

Real Estate

27.5%
1.9%

Utilities

10.6%
2.4%

Industrials

8.3%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
4.9%

Healthcare

3.7%
8.5%

Technology

3.1%
35.6%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
10.1%

Communication Services

1.1%
11.2%

Energy

0.7%
3.5%

Financial Services

XSLV
37.1%
TAIL
11.8%

Real Estate

XSLV
27.5%
TAIL
1.9%

Utilities

XSLV
10.6%
TAIL
2.4%

Industrials

XSLV
8.3%
TAIL
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

XSLV
4.2%
TAIL
4.9%

Healthcare

XSLV
3.7%
TAIL
8.5%

Technology

XSLV
3.1%
TAIL
35.6%

Basic Materials

XSLV
2.3%
TAIL
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XSLV
1.3%
TAIL
10.1%

Communication Services

XSLV
1.1%
TAIL
11.2%

Energy

XSLV
0.7%
TAIL
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSLV vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLV
XSLV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

TAIL
TAIL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
TAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLV vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSLVTAILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.83

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

-0.80

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.80

-2.01

+5.81

XSLV vs. TAIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the TAIL Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLV and TAIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSLVTAILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

-1.03

+1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

-0.57

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

-0.48

+0.89

Drawdowns

XSLV vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLV drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLV and TAIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLVTAILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.34%

-52.36%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-10.95%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.35%

-20.65%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-38.44%

+13.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-51.56%

+48.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-29.12%

+21.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

4.35%

-1.72%

Volatility

XSLV vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) at 0.86%. This indicates that XSLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSLVTAILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

0.86%

+3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

6.45%

+2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

8.51%

+4.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

14.90%

+1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

14.94%

+4.99%

XSLV vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSLV vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison

XSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than TAIL's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
3.49%2.88%3.48%3.74%1.50%0.49%0.36%1.58%1.52%0.91%0.00%0.00%
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
2.61%2.14%2.55%2.35%2.78%1.05%2.49%2.43%2.75%1.87%1.96%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSLV and TAIL have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSLV has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to TAIL (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSLV dropped -44.34% vs TAIL's -52.36%.

On 5-year performance, XSLV leads with 2.94% vs -8.38% for TAIL. On fees, XSLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XSLV has performed better with a 2.94% return vs -8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TAIL.

TAIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.61% for XSLV.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XSLV and 0.59% for TAIL.

XSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSLV and TAIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer