PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLV vs. RTDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSLV vs. RTDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLV achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly lower than RTDYX's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, XSLV has underperformed RTDYX with an annualized return of 5.44%, while RTDYX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.44% annualized return.


XSLV

1D
-1.47%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
6.15%
6M
6.31%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
5.44%

RTDYX

1D
0.20%
1M
5.98%
YTD
12.13%
6M
11.89%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
21.31%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*
14.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLV vs. RTDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
6.15%0.31%9.81%1.34%-11.83%29.34%-17.40%22.35%-5.41%8.57%
RTDYX
Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund
12.13%16.05%22.01%24.92%-16.48%27.22%13.88%30.27%-7.16%21.59%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLV and RTDYX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between XSLV and RTDYX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSLV vs. RTDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLV
XSLV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

RTDYX
RTDYX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RTDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RTDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLV vs. RTDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSLVRTDYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

2.53

-1.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.21

3.47

-2.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.46

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

3.51

-2.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.80

16.35

-12.56

XSLV vs. RTDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the RTDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLV and RTDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSLVRTDYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

2.53

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.54

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.66

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.61

-0.20

Drawdowns

XSLV vs. RTDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLV drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, which is greater than RTDYX's maximum drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLV and RTDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLVRTDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.34%

-37.43%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-8.33%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.35%

-37.43%

+19.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-37.43%

+12.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.34%

-37.43%

-6.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-3.51%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-6.29%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

1.78%

+0.85%

Volatility

XSLV vs. RTDYX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX) at 2.73%. This indicates that XSLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSLVRTDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

2.73%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

8.69%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

11.57%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

24.41%

-7.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

22.11%

-2.18%

XSLV vs. RTDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RTDYX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSLV vs. RTDYX - Dividend Comparison

XSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than RTDYX's 31.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RTDYX
Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund
31.18%35.18%31.60%4.66%6.03%6.51%3.44%6.62%11.47%7.65%1.79%2.57%
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
2.61%2.14%2.55%2.35%2.78%1.05%2.49%2.43%2.75%1.87%1.96%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSLV and RTDYX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSLV has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to RTDYX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSLV dropped -44.34% vs RTDYX's -37.43%.

RTDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSLV and RTDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer