PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLV vs. QLVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSLV vs. QLVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLV achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly higher than QLVD's 2.66% return.


XSLV

1D
-1.47%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
6.15%
6M
6.31%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
5.44%

QLVD

1D
-0.68%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
2.66%
6M
4.87%
1Y
7.04%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLV vs. QLVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
6.15%0.31%9.81%1.34%-11.83%29.34%-17.40%7.21%
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.66%24.21%4.67%11.57%-12.09%9.04%3.00%6.35%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLV and QLVD is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.58

The correlation between XSLV and QLVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSLV vs. QLVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSLV
QLVD

Financial Services

37.1%
24.3%

Real Estate

27.5%
5.3%

Utilities

10.6%
7.9%

Industrials

8.3%
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
11.3%

Healthcare

3.7%
10.6%

Technology

3.1%
5.0%

Basic Materials

2.3%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
5.5%

Communication Services

1.1%
6.7%

Energy

0.7%
3.9%

Financial Services

XSLV
37.1%
QLVD
24.3%

Real Estate

XSLV
27.5%
QLVD
5.3%

Utilities

XSLV
10.6%
QLVD
7.9%

Industrials

XSLV
8.3%
QLVD
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

XSLV
4.2%
QLVD
11.3%

Healthcare

XSLV
3.7%
QLVD
10.6%

Technology

XSLV
3.1%
QLVD
5.0%

Basic Materials

XSLV
2.3%
QLVD
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XSLV
1.3%
QLVD
5.5%

Communication Services

XSLV
1.1%
QLVD
6.7%

Energy

XSLV
0.7%
QLVD
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSLV vs. QLVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLV
XSLV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

QLVD
QLVD Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
QLVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLV vs. QLVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSLVQLVDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

0.67

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.21

1.01

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.12

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

0.87

+0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.80

2.58

+1.22

XSLV vs. QLVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the QLVD Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLV and QLVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSLVQLVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

0.67

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.50

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.48

-0.07

Drawdowns

XSLV vs. QLVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLV drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, which is greater than QLVD's maximum drawdown of -28.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLV and QLVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLVQLVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.34%

-28.20%

-16.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-8.15%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.35%

-9.24%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-23.99%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-6.19%

+3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-5.24%

-2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.74%

-0.11%

Volatility

XSLV vs. QLVD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) at 3.02%. This indicates that XSLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSLVQLVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

3.02%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

8.28%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

10.52%

+2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

11.73%

+4.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

13.97%

+5.96%

XSLV vs. QLVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QLVD's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSLV vs. QLVD - Dividend Comparison

XSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than QLVD's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.78%2.87%3.01%3.33%2.47%3.06%1.78%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
2.61%2.14%2.55%2.35%2.78%1.05%2.49%2.43%2.75%1.87%1.96%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSLV and QLVD have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSLV has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to QLVD (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSLV dropped -44.34% vs QLVD's -28.20%.

On 5-year performance, QLVD leads with 5.83% vs 2.94% for XSLV. On fees, XSLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, QLVD has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QLVD has performed better with a 5.83% return vs 2.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QLVD.

QLVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 2.61% for XSLV.

XSLV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index, while QLVD tracks Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XSLV and 0.32% for QLVD.

XSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSLV and QLVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer