XSLV vs. EJAN

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

XSLV (Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF) and EJAN (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds - XSLV tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index while EJAN tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSLV returned 4.94%/yr vs 2.92%/yr for EJAN. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EJAN.

Performance

XSLV vs. EJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLV achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly higher than EJAN's 5.12% return.

XSLV

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 2.52%
• 6M: 11.86%
• YTD: 14.75%
• 1Y: 16.62%
• 3Y*: 11.57%
• 5Y*: 4.94%
• 10Y*: 5.75%

EJAN

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: -0.76%
• 6M: 2.67%
• YTD: 5.12%
• 1Y: 10.61%
• 3Y*: 6.76%
• 5Y*: 2.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLV vs. EJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XSLV Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF	14.75%	0.31%	9.81%	1.34%	-11.83%	29.34%	-17.40%
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January	5.12%	14.78%	2.69%	5.37%	-8.01%	-1.53%	10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLV and EJAN is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020	0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between XSLV and EJAN has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XSLV vs. EJAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XSLV	EJAN
Financial Services	43.2%	18.1%
Real Estate	28.5%	1.0%
Utilities	9.1%	1.9%
Industrials	7.2%	6.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	2.7%
Basic Materials	2.7%	6.0%
Consumer Cyclical	2.3%	8.9%
Healthcare	1.5%	2.6%
Communication Services	1.1%	6.3%
Technology	0.9%	42.0%
Energy	0.8%	3.6%

Return for Risk

XSLV vs. EJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLV

XSLV Risk / Return Rank: 48
XSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
XSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
XSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 41
XSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
XSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 49

EJAN

EJAN Risk / Return Rank: 48
EJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
EJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
EJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 59
EJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
EJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLV vs. EJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XSLV	EJAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	1.27	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	1.81	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.29	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	1.61	+0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.51	7.23	-0.73

XSLV vs. EJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the EJAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLV and EJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XSLV vs. EJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLV drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, which is greater than EJAN's maximum drawdown of -22.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLV and EJAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSLV	EJAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.34%	-22.23%	-22.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.46%	-6.63%	-0.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.35%	-11.75%	-6.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.72%	-20.99%	-3.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-1.76%	+1.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.24%	-5.70%	-1.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	1.47%	+1.09%

Volatility

XSLV vs. EJAN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) at 3.15%. This indicates that XSLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSLV	EJAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.96%	3.15%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.42%	8.07%	+1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.28%	8.43%	+4.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.70%	11.16%	+5.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.91%	12.66%	+7.25%

XSLV vs. EJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EJAN's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSLV vs. EJAN - Dividend Comparison

XSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, while EJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XSLV Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF	2.10%	2.14%	2.55%	2.35%	2.78%	1.05%	2.49%	2.43%	2.75%	1.87%	1.96%	2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSLV and EJAN in my portfolio?

XSLV and EJAN have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XSLV or EJAN?

XSLV has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to EJAN (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSLV dropped -44.34% vs EJAN's -22.23%.

Which ETF is better, XSLV or EJAN?

On 5-year performance, XSLV leads with 4.94% vs 2.92% for EJAN. On fees, XSLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EJAN has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XSLV or EJAN?

Over the 5-year period, XSLV has performed better with a 4.94% return vs 2.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSLV or EJAN?

XSLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XSLV or EJAN?

XSLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for EJAN.

What is the main difference between XSLV and EJAN?

XSLV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index, while EJAN tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XSLV and 0.89% for EJAN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.