PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLR.DE vs. IAUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSLR.DE vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSLR.DE is traded in EUR, while IAUM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IAUM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLR.DE achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than IAUM's 5.02% return.


XSLR.DE

1D
0.40%
1M
0.98%
YTD
-2.22%
6M
29.60%
1Y
110.52%
3Y*
42.16%
5Y*
22.38%
10Y*

IAUM

1D
0.67%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
5.02%
6M
6.67%
1Y
30.43%
3Y*
28.09%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLR.DE vs. IAUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XSLR.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities
-2.22%129.87%30.90%-4.25%10.74%-6.89%
IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro
5.02%44.78%35.42%9.73%5.68%8.70%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLR.DE and IAUM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.56

The correlation between XSLR.DE and IAUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSLR.DE vs. IAUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLR.DE
XSLR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XSLR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

IAUM
IAUM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IAUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUM Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLR.DE vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSLR.DEIAUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.25

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.79

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.15

4.27

+1.88

XSLR.DE vs. IAUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the IAUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLR.DE and IAUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSLR.DEIAUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.23

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.29

-0.54

Drawdowns

XSLR.DE vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLR.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.56%, which is greater than IAUM's maximum drawdown of -17.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLR.DE and IAUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLR.DEIAUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.56%

-17.09%

-21.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.56%

-17.09%

-21.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.56%

-17.09%

-21.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.47%

-15.48%

-17.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.27%

-4.29%

-7.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.90%

7.14%

+10.76%

Volatility

XSLR.DE vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) has a higher volatility of 16.38% compared to iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) at 4.60%. This indicates that XSLR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSLR.DEIAUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.38%

4.60%

+11.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.92%

21.54%

+30.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.45%

24.88%

+29.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.34%

16.61%

+16.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.14%

16.61%

+16.53%

XSLR.DE vs. IAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLR.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUM's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSLR.DE vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSLR.DE nor IAUM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XSLR.DE and IAUM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSLR.DE.

XSLR.DE is categorized as Silver, while IAUM is Gold. XSLR.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price, while IAUM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSLR.DE and 0.09% for IAUM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSLR.DE and IAUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer