XSHQ vs. QQQM
XSHQ (Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSHQ is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSHQ returned 5.96%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSHQ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
XSHQ vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSHQ achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
XSHQ
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 15.18%
- 3Y*
- 11.81%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
XSHQ vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSHQ Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF | 9.09% | 0.89% | 7.49% | 23.88% | -15.01% | 23.99% | 17.03% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSHQ and QQQM is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.59 |
The correlation between XSHQ and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSHQ vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSHQ
QQQM
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XSHQ
QQQM
Industrials
XSHQ
QQQM
Technology
XSHQ
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
XSHQ
QQQM
Healthcare
XSHQ
QQQM
Energy
XSHQ
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
XSHQ
QQQM
Basic Materials
XSHQ
QQQM
Communication Services
XSHQ
QQQM
Real Estate
XSHQ
QQQM
Utilities
XSHQ
-
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSHQ vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
XSHQ
QQQM
XSHQ vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSHQ | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.45 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 3.53 | -2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | 13.52 | -9.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSHQ | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 2.65 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.82 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.85 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
XSHQ vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSHQ drawdown since its inception was -38.33%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHQ and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSHQ | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.33% | -35.04% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.27% | -11.96% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.34% | -22.70% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.34% | -35.04% | +7.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -0.20% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.35% | -8.25% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 3.11% | +0.64% |
Volatility
XSHQ vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) have volatilities of 4.57% and 4.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSHQ | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 4.48% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.66% | 12.05% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 15.91% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 22.24% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.13% | 22.12% | +1.01% |
XSHQ vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSHQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSHQ vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
XSHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSHQ Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF | 1.38% | 1.48% | 1.18% | 1.15% | 2.02% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.11% | 1.16% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSHQ and QQQM have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSHQ has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSHQ dropped -38.33% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 5.96% for XSHQ. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 5.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XSHQ.
XSHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
XSHQ is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. XSHQ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XSHQ and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSHQ and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer