XSHQ vs. DGRW
XSHQ (Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF) and DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both Quality Factor funds - XSHQ tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index while DGRW tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSHQ returned 7.26%/yr vs 11.41%/yr for DGRW. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XSHQ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DGRW.
Performance
XSHQ vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSHQ achieves a 14.76% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 8.57% return.
XSHQ
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- YTD
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 20.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.48%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.92%
DGRW
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 1Y
- 16.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.97%
- 5Y*
- 11.41%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $51.03M | $48.50M | $56.54M | |
| $7.28M | $3.86M | $2.26M |
XSHQ vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSHQ Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF | 14.76% | 0.89% | 7.49% | 23.88% | -15.01% | 23.99% | 11.81% | 17.37% | -6.11% | 7.18% |
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 8.57% | 12.17% | 16.98% | 18.66% | -6.33% | 24.46% | 13.87% | 29.54% | -5.38% | 13.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSHQ and DGRW is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017 | 0.71 |
The correlation between XSHQ and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSHQ vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSHQ
DGRW
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XSHQ
DGRW
Technology
XSHQ
DGRW
Industrials
XSHQ
DGRW
Consumer Cyclical
XSHQ
DGRW
Healthcare
XSHQ
DGRW
Energy
XSHQ
DGRW
Communication Services
XSHQ
DGRW
Basic Materials
XSHQ
DGRW
Consumer Defensive
XSHQ
DGRW
Real Estate
XSHQ
DGRW
-
Utilities
XSHQ
-
DGRW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSHQ vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank
XSHQ
DGRW
XSHQ vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSHQ | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.26 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.79 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.91 | 7.25 | -2.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSHQ vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSHQ drawdown since its inception was -38.33%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHQ and DGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSHQ | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.33% | -32.04% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.27% | -8.30% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.34% | -16.21% | -11.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.34% | -17.27% | -10.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -1.31% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.19% | -3.00% | -6.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 2.05% | +1.68% |
Volatility
XSHQ vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.92%. This indicates that XSHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSHQ | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 2.92% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.69% | 8.33% | +3.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.30% | 10.44% | +6.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 14.01% | +7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 16.18% | +6.82% |
XSHQ vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSHQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSHQ vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison
XSHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than DGRW's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
XSHQ Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF | 1.18% | 1.48% | 1.18% | 1.15% | 2.02% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.11% | 1.16% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSHQ and DGRW have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSHQ has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to DGRW (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSHQ dropped -38.33% vs DGRW's -32.04%.
On 5-year performance, DGRW leads with 11.41% vs 7.26% for XSHQ. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 11.41% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XSHQ.
DGRW has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.18% for XSHQ.
XSHQ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XSHQ and 0.28% for DGRW.
DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSHQ and DGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer