PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSHG.TO vs. CLG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSHG.TO vs. CLG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced 1-5 Year Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSHG.TO) and iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XSHG.TO having a 1.14% return and CLG.TO slightly lower at 1.12%.


XSHG.TO

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.96%
YTD
1.14%
6M
1.23%
1Y
3.54%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
10Y*

CLG.TO

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.14%
YTD
1.12%
6M
0.59%
1Y
2.87%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
1.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSHG.TO vs. CLG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XSHG.TO
iShares ESG Advanced 1-5 Year Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.14%4.53%6.86%6.41%-4.26%-0.58%
CLG.TO
iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF
1.12%3.35%4.30%4.82%-6.21%-1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between XSHG.TO and CLG.TO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021

0.55

The correlation between XSHG.TO and CLG.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSHG.TO vs. CLG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSHG.TO
XSHG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XSHG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSHG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSHG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XSHG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSHG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CLG.TO
CLG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
CLG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CLG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSHG.TO vs. CLG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced 1-5 Year Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSHG.TO) and iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSHG.TOCLG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.18

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

1.49

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.54

3.71

+5.83

XSHG.TO vs. CLG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSHG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the CLG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSHG.TO and CLG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSHG.TOCLG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

0.96

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.54

+0.48

Drawdowns

XSHG.TO vs. CLG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSHG.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.40%, smaller than the maximum CLG.TO drawdown of -10.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHG.TO and CLG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSHG.TOCLG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.40%

-10.74%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

-1.93%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.44%

-3.38%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.56%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.84%

-2.00%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

0.77%

-0.40%

Volatility

XSHG.TO vs. CLG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Advanced 1-5 Year Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSHG.TO) is 0.68%, while iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that XSHG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSHG.TOCLG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

1.13%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.52%

2.34%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82%

3.00%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

4.31%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.79%

4.34%

-1.55%

XSHG.TO vs. CLG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XSHG.TO and CLG.TO have an expense ratio of 0.17%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSHG.TO vs. CLG.TO - Dividend Comparison

XSHG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than CLG.TO's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLG.TO
iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF
2.54%2.54%2.53%2.51%2.55%2.61%2.59%2.88%3.02%3.17%3.25%3.34%
XSHG.TO
iShares ESG Advanced 1-5 Year Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF
3.72%3.64%3.39%2.87%2.69%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSHG.TO and CLG.TO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.17% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSHG.TO and CLG.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.17% per year.

XSHG.TO tracks Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD, while CLG.TO tracks Morningstar Can Core Bd GR CAD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSHG.TO and CLG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer