XSHD vs. EJAN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

XSHD (Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) and EJAN (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January) are both exchange-traded funds - XSHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while EJAN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSHD returned -2.71%/yr vs 3.35%/yr for EJAN. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XSHD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EJAN.

Performance

XSHD vs. EJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSHD achieves a 14.67% return, which is significantly higher than EJAN's 6.41% return.

XSHD

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 7.76%
• YTD: 14.67%
• 1Y: 16.47%
• 3Y*: 2.14%
• 5Y*: -2.71%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -0.02%

EJAN

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: 3.37%
• YTD: 6.41%
• 1Y: 11.78%
• 3Y*: 7.54%
• 5Y*: 3.35%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January	$255.76K	$192.84K	$472.80K
XSHD Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	$445.72K	$396.15K	$476.24K

XSHD vs. EJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XSHD Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	14.67%	-6.41%	-5.25%	3.00%	-19.48%	18.31%	-13.55%
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January	6.41%	14.78%	2.69%	5.37%	-8.01%	-1.53%	10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between XSHD and EJAN is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020	0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between XSHD and EJAN has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XSHD vs. EJAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XSHD	EJAN
Real Estate	40.3%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	12.1%	2.6%
Utilities	11.5%	1.8%
Industrials	10.5%	6.3%
Energy	7.6%	3.2%
Basic Materials	6.7%	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	7.5%
Communication Services	4.2%	6.0%
Healthcare	0.6%	2.5%
Financial Services	0.1%	18.5%
Technology	-	45.2%

Return for Risk

XSHD vs. EJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XSHD

XSHD Risk / Return Rank: 43
XSHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
XSHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
XSHD Omega Ratio Rank: 41
XSHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
XSHD Martin Ratio Rank: 40

EJAN

EJAN Risk / Return Rank: 55
EJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
EJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
EJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 65
EJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
EJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XSHD vs. EJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XSHD	EJAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	1.37	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	1.97	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.30	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	1.78	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.41	7.81	-3.40

XSHD vs. EJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the EJAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSHD and EJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XSHD vs. EJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSHD drawdown since its inception was -49.53%, which is greater than EJAN's maximum drawdown of -22.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHD and EJAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSHD	EJAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.53%	-22.23%	-27.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.51%	-6.63%	-3.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.77%	-11.75%	-9.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.67%	-20.84%	-13.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.14%	-0.56%	-19.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.44%	-5.67%	-10.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	1.51%	+2.23%

Volatility

XSHD vs. EJAN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) at 2.74%. This indicates that XSHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSHD	EJAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	2.74%	+1.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.22%	8.18%	+2.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.94%	8.65%	+6.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.81%	11.15%	+7.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.14%	12.63%	+9.51%

XSHD vs. EJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSHD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EJAN's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSHD vs. EJAN - Dividend Comparison

XSHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, while EJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XSHD Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	4.89%	6.45%	7.25%	7.62%	6.77%	3.86%	5.55%	4.88%	5.49%	4.11%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSHD and EJAN in my portfolio?

XSHD and EJAN have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XSHD or EJAN?

XSHD has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to EJAN (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSHD dropped -49.53% vs EJAN's -22.23%.

Which ETF is better, XSHD or EJAN?

On 5-year performance, EJAN leads with 3.35% vs -2.71% for XSHD. On fees, XSHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EJAN has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XSHD or EJAN?

Over the 5-year period, EJAN has performed better with a 3.35% return vs -2.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSHD or EJAN?

XSHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XSHD or EJAN?

XSHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 0.00% for EJAN.

What is the main difference between XSHD and EJAN?

XSHD is categorized as Dividend, while EJAN is Defined Outcome. XSHD tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while EJAN tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XSHD and 0.89% for EJAN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.