XSFN.L vs. XS7R.L
XSFN.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D) and XS7R.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both Financials Equities funds from Xtrackers tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSFN.L returned 9.61%/yr vs 17.60%/yr for XS7R.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSFN.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XS7R.L.
Performance
XSFN.L vs. XS7R.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSFN.L achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than XS7R.L's 2.58% return.
XSFN.L
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -2.92%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- —
XS7R.L
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 21.96%
- 3Y*
- 26.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
XSFN.L vs. XS7R.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSFN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D | -5.19% | 7.83% | 34.69% | 8.03% | -2.82% | 38.02% | -7.44% | 29.37% | -6.51% |
XS7R.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 2.58% | 47.44% | 18.33% | 20.38% | 3.19% | 27.29% | -19.81% | 7.94% | -22.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSFN.L and XS7R.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2018 | 0.44 |
The correlation between XSFN.L and XS7R.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSFN.L vs. XS7R.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSFN.L
XS7R.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XSFN.L
XS7R.L
Technology
XSFN.L
XS7R.L
Industrials
XSFN.L
XS7R.L
Real Estate
XSFN.L
XS7R.L
-
Basic Materials
XSFN.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Communication Services
XSFN.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSFN.L
-
XS7R.L
Consumer Defensive
XSFN.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Energy
XSFN.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Healthcare
XSFN.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Utilities
XSFN.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSFN.L vs. XS7R.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSFN.L
XS7R.L
XSFN.L vs. XS7R.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSFN.L | XS7R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.24 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 1.93 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | 6.59 | -5.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSFN.L | XS7R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 1.35 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.99 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.10 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
XSFN.L vs. XS7R.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSFN.L drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum XS7R.L drawdown of -66.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSFN.L and XS7R.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSFN.L | XS7R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -66.04% | +32.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.39% | -11.33% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.67% | -15.17% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.67% | -23.60% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.19% | -2.39% | -4.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -26.41% | +20.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.72% | 3.32% | +2.40% |
Volatility
XSFN.L vs. XS7R.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) is 4.56%, while Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that XSFN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XS7R.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSFN.L | XS7R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 5.07% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 13.42% | -2.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.43% | 16.25% | -1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 18.86% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.77% | 22.52% | +1.25% |
XSFN.L vs. XS7R.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSFN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XS7R.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSFN.L vs. XS7R.L - Dividend Comparison
XSFN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while XS7R.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XS7R.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSFN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.10% | 1.69% | 2.57% | 1.31% | 1.31% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSFN.L and XS7R.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSFN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSFN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XS7R.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSFN.L and 0.20% for XS7R.L.
Find the right allocation for XSFN.L and XS7R.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer