XSFN.L vs. XDJP.L
XSFN.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D) and XDJP.L (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XSFN.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while XDJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSFN.L returned 9.61%/yr vs 12.61%/yr for XDJP.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSFN.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XDJP.L.
Performance
XSFN.L vs. XDJP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSFN.L achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than XDJP.L's 31.98% return.
XSFN.L
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -2.92%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- —
XDJP.L
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 10.95%
- YTD
- 31.98%
- 6M
- 29.24%
- 1Y
- 64.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
XSFN.L vs. XDJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSFN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D | -5.19% | 7.83% | 34.69% | 8.03% | -2.82% | 38.02% | -7.44% | 29.37% | -6.51% |
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 31.98% | 21.04% | 9.67% | 15.52% | -10.26% | -3.79% | 21.77% | 16.58% | -3.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSFN.L and XDJP.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2018 | 0.29 |
The correlation between XSFN.L and XDJP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSFN.L vs. XDJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSFN.L
XDJP.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XSFN.L
XDJP.L
Technology
XSFN.L
XDJP.L
Industrials
XSFN.L
XDJP.L
Real Estate
XSFN.L
XDJP.L
Basic Materials
XSFN.L
-
XDJP.L
Communication Services
XSFN.L
-
XDJP.L
Consumer Cyclical
XSFN.L
-
XDJP.L
Consumer Defensive
XSFN.L
-
XDJP.L
Energy
XSFN.L
-
XDJP.L
Healthcare
XSFN.L
-
XDJP.L
Utilities
XSFN.L
-
XDJP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSFN.L vs. XDJP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSFN.L
XDJP.L
XSFN.L vs. XDJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSFN.L | XDJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.48 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 4.77 | -4.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | 14.50 | -13.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSFN.L | XDJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 2.85 | -2.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.71 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.75 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
XSFN.L vs. XDJP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSFN.L drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, which is greater than XDJP.L's maximum drawdown of -23.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSFN.L and XDJP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSFN.L | XDJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -23.69% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.39% | -13.40% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.67% | -18.82% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.67% | -20.61% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.19% | -1.35% | -5.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -6.79% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.72% | 4.42% | +1.30% |
Volatility
XSFN.L vs. XDJP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) is 4.56%, while Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that XSFN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSFN.L | XDJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 6.75% | -2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 17.68% | -6.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.43% | 22.44% | -8.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 17.72% | +1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.77% | 17.63% | +6.14% |
XSFN.L vs. XDJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSFN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than XDJP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSFN.L vs. XDJP.L - Dividend Comparison
XSFN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than XDJP.L's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 2.47% | 1.20% | 1.11% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 0.72% | 0.83% | 0.16% |
XSFN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.10% | 1.69% | 2.57% | 1.31% | 1.31% | 3.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSFN.L and XDJP.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XSFN.L.
XSFN.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while XDJP.L is Japan Equities. XSFN.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSFN.L and 0.09% for XDJP.L.
Find the right allocation for XSFN.L and XDJP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer