PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSFN.L vs. X7PS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSFN.L vs. X7PS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (X7PS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSFN.L is traded in GBp, while X7PS.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the X7PS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSFN.L achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than X7PS.L's 13.65% return.


XSFN.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.30%
6M
3.58%
YTD
3.15%
1Y
9.09%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*

X7PS.L

1D
-0.99%
1M
-0.04%
6M
10.58%
YTD
13.65%
1Y
47.90%
3Y*
43.02%
5Y*
31.54%
10Y*
16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSFN.L vs. X7PS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSFN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D
3.15%7.83%33.18%8.53%-2.16%38.75%-6.87%27.92%-6.44%
X7PS.L
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
13.65%87.84%27.12%23.19%5.63%30.02%-18.45%7.52%-22.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XSFN.L and X7PS.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2018

0.58

The correlation between XSFN.L and X7PS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSFN.L vs. X7PS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSFN.L
XSFN.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XSFN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSFN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSFN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
XSFN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSFN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

X7PS.L
X7PS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
X7PS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSFN.L vs. X7PS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (X7PS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSFN.LX7PS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.35

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

2.97

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.56

9.92

-8.37

XSFN.L vs. X7PS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSFN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the X7PS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSFN.L and X7PS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSFN.L vs. X7PS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSFN.L drawdown since its inception was -36.54%, smaller than the maximum X7PS.L drawdown of -56.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSFN.L and X7PS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSFN.LX7PS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.54%

-56.34%

+19.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.39%

-16.07%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.67%

-18.22%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.67%

-30.73%

+11.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-2.58%

+2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-14.49%

+7.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.83%

4.81%

+1.02%

Volatility

XSFN.L vs. X7PS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) is 3.62%, while Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (X7PS.L) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that XSFN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSFN.LX7PS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

5.51%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.74%

18.93%

-8.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

22.34%

-7.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.77%

23.77%

-6.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

24.61%

-4.02%

XSFN.L vs. X7PS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSFN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than X7PS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSFN.L vs. X7PS.L - Dividend Comparison

XSFN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while X7PS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
X7PS.L
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSFN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D
1.07%1.14%1.10%1.67%2.55%1.31%1.32%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSFN.L and X7PS.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSFN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSFN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PS.L.

XSFN.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while X7PS.L is Europe Equities. XSFN.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while X7PS.L tracks STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks Index (EUR). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSFN.L and 0.20% for X7PS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSFN.L and X7PS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer