XSFN.L vs. IUSA.L
XSFN.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D) and IUSA.L (iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - XSFN.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while IUSA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSFN.L returned 9.61%/yr vs 15.33%/yr for IUSA.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSFN.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IUSA.L.
Performance
XSFN.L vs. IUSA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSFN.L achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than IUSA.L's 10.67% return.
XSFN.L
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -2.92%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- —
IUSA.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 29.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.42%
- 5Y*
- 15.33%
- 10Y*
- 16.52%
XSFN.L vs. IUSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSFN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D | -5.19% | 7.83% | 34.69% | 8.03% | -2.82% | 38.02% | -7.44% | 29.37% | -6.51% |
IUSA.L iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist | 10.67% | 9.70% | 27.73% | 20.24% | -8.72% | 31.54% | 14.15% | 27.06% | 2.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSFN.L and IUSA.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2018 | 0.50 |
The correlation between XSFN.L and IUSA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSFN.L vs. IUSA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSFN.L
IUSA.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XSFN.L
IUSA.L
Technology
XSFN.L
IUSA.L
Industrials
XSFN.L
IUSA.L
Real Estate
XSFN.L
IUSA.L
Basic Materials
XSFN.L
-
IUSA.L
Communication Services
XSFN.L
-
IUSA.L
Consumer Cyclical
XSFN.L
-
IUSA.L
Consumer Defensive
XSFN.L
-
IUSA.L
Energy
XSFN.L
-
IUSA.L
Healthcare
XSFN.L
-
IUSA.L
Utilities
XSFN.L
-
IUSA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSFN.L vs. IUSA.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSFN.L
IUSA.L
XSFN.L vs. IUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) and iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSFN.L | IUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.53 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 4.20 | -3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | 15.53 | -14.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSFN.L | IUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 2.82 | -2.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 1.07 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.58 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
XSFN.L vs. IUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSFN.L drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum IUSA.L drawdown of -38.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSFN.L and IUSA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSFN.L | IUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -38.58% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.39% | -7.01% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.67% | -21.08% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.67% | -21.08% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.19% | -0.22% | -6.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -7.29% | +1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.72% | 1.90% | +3.82% |
Volatility
XSFN.L vs. IUSA.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that XSFN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSFN.L | IUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 2.62% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 7.13% | +3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.43% | 10.44% | +3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 14.33% | +4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.77% | 15.60% | +8.17% |
XSFN.L vs. IUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSFN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSFN.L vs. IUSA.L - Dividend Comparison
XSFN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, which matches IUSA.L's 1.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSA.L iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist | 1.15% | 1.24% | 1.28% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 1.39% | 1.80% | 1.96% | 2.22% | 1.95% | 1.75% | 2.29% |
XSFN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.10% | 1.69% | 2.57% | 1.31% | 1.31% | 3.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSFN.L and IUSA.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XSFN.L.
XSFN.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while IUSA.L is S&P 500. XSFN.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while IUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSFN.L and 0.07% for IUSA.L.
Find the right allocation for XSFN.L and IUSA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer