XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L
XSFN.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D) and IPRV.L (iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Financials Equities funds - XSFN.L tracks the MSCI World/Financials NR USD while IPRV.L tracks the S&P Listed Private Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSFN.L returned 9.61%/yr vs 6.33%/yr for IPRV.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSFN.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IPRV.L.
Performance
XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSFN.L achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly higher than IPRV.L's -12.08% return.
XSFN.L
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -2.92%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- —
IPRV.L
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- YTD
- -12.08%
- 6M
- -10.54%
- 1Y
- -7.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.33%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSFN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D | -5.19% | 7.83% | 34.69% | 8.03% | -2.82% | 38.02% | -7.44% | 29.37% | -6.51% |
IPRV.L iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -12.08% | -4.65% | 26.96% | 32.91% | -19.32% | 45.11% | 2.39% | 40.72% | -2.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSFN.L and IPRV.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between XSFN.L and IPRV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSFN.L
IPRV.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XSFN.L
IPRV.L
Technology
XSFN.L
IPRV.L
Industrials
XSFN.L
IPRV.L
Real Estate
XSFN.L
IPRV.L
-
Basic Materials
XSFN.L
-
IPRV.L
-
Communication Services
XSFN.L
-
IPRV.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSFN.L
-
IPRV.L
Consumer Defensive
XSFN.L
-
IPRV.L
Energy
XSFN.L
-
IPRV.L
-
Healthcare
XSFN.L
-
IPRV.L
Utilities
XSFN.L
-
IPRV.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSFN.L
IPRV.L
XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) and iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IPRV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSFN.L | IPRV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.95 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | -0.33 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | -0.69 | +1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSFN.L | IPRV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | -0.41 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.32 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.16 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSFN.L drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum IPRV.L drawdown of -74.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSFN.L and IPRV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSFN.L | IPRV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -74.08% | +40.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.39% | -23.47% | +10.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.67% | -27.90% | +8.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.67% | -27.90% | +8.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.19% | -22.45% | +15.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -11.64% | +5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.72% | 11.08% | -5.36% |
Volatility
XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) is 4.56%, while iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IPRV.L) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that XSFN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPRV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSFN.L | IPRV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 5.75% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 15.11% | -4.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.43% | 18.90% | -4.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 19.52% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.77% | 20.36% | +3.41% |
XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSFN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IPRV.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Dividend Comparison
XSFN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than IPRV.L's 5.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPRV.L iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 5.23% | 3.98% | 3.81% | 4.27% | 5.26% | 3.42% | 4.85% | 4.28% | 6.46% | 6.70% | 5.33% | 8.21% |
XSFN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.10% | 1.69% | 2.57% | 1.31% | 1.31% | 3.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSFN.L and IPRV.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSFN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSFN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IPRV.L.
XSFN.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while IPRV.L tracks S&P Listed Private Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSFN.L and 0.75% for IPRV.L.
Find the right allocation for XSFN.L and IPRV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer