PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) and iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IPRV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSFN.L achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly higher than IPRV.L's -12.08% return.


XSFN.L

1D
3.29%
1M
1.94%
YTD
-5.19%
6M
-2.92%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*

IPRV.L

1D
2.62%
1M
-2.90%
YTD
-12.08%
6M
-10.54%
1Y
-7.71%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
12.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSFN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D
-5.19%7.83%34.69%8.03%-2.82%38.02%-7.44%29.37%-6.51%
IPRV.L
iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-12.08%-4.65%26.96%32.91%-19.32%45.11%2.39%40.72%-2.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XSFN.L and IPRV.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2018

0.52

The correlation between XSFN.L and IPRV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSFN.L
IPRV.L

Financial Services

97.7%
99.0%

Technology

1.9%
0.1%

Industrials

0.2%
0.7%

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

XSFN.L
97.7%
IPRV.L
99.0%

Technology

XSFN.L
1.9%
IPRV.L
0.1%

Industrials

XSFN.L
0.2%
IPRV.L
0.7%

Real Estate

XSFN.L
0.2%
IPRV.L

-

Basic Materials

XSFN.L

-

IPRV.L

-

Communication Services

XSFN.L

-

IPRV.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XSFN.L

-

IPRV.L
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

XSFN.L

-

IPRV.L
0.0%

Energy

XSFN.L

-

IPRV.L

-

Healthcare

XSFN.L

-

IPRV.L
0.0%

Utilities

XSFN.L

-

IPRV.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSFN.L
XSFN.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XSFN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSFN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSFN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XSFN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSFN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

IPRV.L
IPRV.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IPRV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPRV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPRV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IPRV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPRV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) and iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IPRV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSFN.LIPRV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.95

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

-0.33

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.85

-0.69

+1.54

XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSFN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the IPRV.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSFN.L and IPRV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSFN.LIPRV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

-0.41

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.32

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.16

+0.50

Drawdowns

XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSFN.L drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum IPRV.L drawdown of -74.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSFN.L and IPRV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSFN.LIPRV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.95%

-74.08%

+40.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.39%

-23.47%

+10.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.67%

-27.90%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.67%

-27.90%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.19%

-22.45%

+15.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-11.64%

+5.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.72%

11.08%

-5.36%

Volatility

XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) is 4.56%, while iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IPRV.L) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that XSFN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPRV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSFN.LIPRV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

5.75%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

15.11%

-4.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.43%

18.90%

-4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.13%

19.52%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.77%

20.36%

+3.41%

XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSFN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IPRV.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSFN.L vs. IPRV.L - Dividend Comparison

XSFN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than IPRV.L's 5.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPRV.L
iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.23%3.98%3.81%4.27%5.26%3.42%4.85%4.28%6.46%6.70%5.33%8.21%
XSFN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D
1.16%1.14%1.10%1.69%2.57%1.31%1.31%3.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSFN.L and IPRV.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSFN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSFN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IPRV.L.

XSFN.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while IPRV.L tracks S&P Listed Private Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSFN.L and 0.75% for IPRV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSFN.L and IPRV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer