PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSEP vs. BUFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSEP vs. BUFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) and FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSEP achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly lower than BUFD's 4.64% return.


XSEP

1D
0.05%
1M
0.32%
YTD
4.33%
6M
4.10%
1Y
9.51%
3Y*
9.48%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFD

1D
0.08%
1M
0.00%
YTD
4.64%
6M
4.12%
1Y
12.44%
3Y*
11.62%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSEP vs. BUFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XSEP
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September
4.33%8.94%8.41%16.07%2.93%
BUFD
FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF
4.64%10.66%12.42%15.40%0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between XSEP and BUFD is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2022

0.82

The correlation between XSEP and BUFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSEP vs. BUFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSEP
XSEP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
XSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFD
BUFD Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFD Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSEP vs. BUFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) and FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSEPBUFDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.49

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

3.64

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.49

19.50

-5.01

XSEP vs. BUFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the BUFD Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSEP and BUFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSEP vs. BUFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSEP drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, smaller than the maximum BUFD drawdown of -10.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSEP and BUFD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSEPBUFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-10.75%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.51%

-3.43%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.21%

-10.15%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.64%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-1.95%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

0.64%

+0.02%

Volatility

XSEP vs. BUFD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) is 0.99%, while FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that XSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSEPBUFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

1.67%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.88%

4.17%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.82%

5.26%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.98%

7.75%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.98%

7.54%

-0.56%

XSEP vs. BUFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSEP vs. BUFD - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSEP nor BUFD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XSEP and BUFD have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFD has higher volatility (1.67%) compared to XSEP (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSEP dropped -9.21% vs BUFD's -10.75%.

On 3-year performance, BUFD leads with 11.62% vs 9.48% for XSEP. On fees, XSEP is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XSEP has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BUFD has performed better with a 11.62% return vs 9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSEP is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFD.

XSEP and BUFD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

XSEP is categorized as Options Trading, while BUFD is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XSEP and 0.95% for BUFD.

BUFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSEP and BUFD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer