PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSEP vs. APRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XSEP vs. APRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XSEP vs. APRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XSEP
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September
-1.18%8.94%8.41%16.07%2.83%
APRW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF
1.48%6.18%11.25%12.38%2.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSEP achieves a -1.18% return, which is significantly lower than APRW's 1.48% return.


XSEP

1D
1.48%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
-1.18%
6M
0.70%
1Y
8.32%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
10Y*

APRW

1D
0.16%
1M
0.58%
YTD
1.48%
6M
3.35%
1Y
10.24%
3Y*
9.39%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XSEP vs. APRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than APRW's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XSEP vs. APRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSEP
XSEP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

APRW
APRW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
APRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRW Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
APRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRW Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSEP vs. APRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSEPAPRWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

1.49

-0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

2.20

-0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.51

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.93

-0.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.38

13.27

-5.89

XSEP vs. APRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSEP Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the APRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSEP and APRW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSEPAPRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.49

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.39

1.04

+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between XSEP and APRW is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XSEP vs. APRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSEP nor APRW has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
XSEP
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
APRW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.67%

Drawdowns

XSEP vs. APRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSEP drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, roughly equal to the maximum APRW drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSEP and APRW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XSEPAPRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-9.61%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-5.62%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

0.00%

-2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-1.15%

+0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

0.82%

+0.35%

Volatility

XSEP vs. APRW - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) at 0.71%. This indicates that XSEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XSEPAPRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

0.71%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.27%

1.60%

+2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.39%

6.93%

+2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.14%

6.73%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.14%

6.47%

+0.67%