PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XSEN.L vs. INRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XSEN.L vs. INRG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XSEN.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D) and INRG.L (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Energy Equities funds - XSEN.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while INRG.L tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSEN.L returned 21.37%/yr vs 2.72%/yr for INRG.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSEN.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INRG.L.

Performance

XSEN.L vs. INRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSEN.L achieves a 30.06% return, which is significantly lower than INRG.L's 39.09% return.

XSEN.L

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
30.06%
6M
28.04%
1Y
45.70%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
21.37%
10Y*
—

INRG.L

1D
-2.01%
1M
8.39%
YTD
39.09%
6M
35.51%
1Y
82.63%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSEN.L vs. INRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSEN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D		30.06%1.87%6.67%-5.89%82.86%50.90%-35.95%5.01%-12.11%
INRG.L
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		39.09%34.75%-24.39%-23.83%5.52%-23.71%135.23%39.22%-3.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XSEN.L and INRG.L is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018

0.25

The correlation between XSEN.L and INRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSEN.L vs. INRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XSEN.L
INRG.L

Energy

100.0%
24.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.3%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

28.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

10.5%

Utilities

-

33.7%

Energy

XSEN.L
100.0%
INRG.L
24.7%

Basic Materials

XSEN.L

-

INRG.L
1.3%

Communication Services

XSEN.L

-

INRG.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XSEN.L

-

INRG.L
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

XSEN.L

-

INRG.L

-

Financial Services

XSEN.L

-

INRG.L

-

Healthcare

XSEN.L

-

INRG.L

-

Industrials

XSEN.L

-

INRG.L
28.3%

Real Estate

XSEN.L

-

INRG.L

-

Technology

XSEN.L

-

INRG.L
10.5%

Utilities

XSEN.L

-

INRG.L
33.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D

iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Often compared with XSEN.L:
XSEN.L vs. GXLE.LXSEN.L vs. EYED.LXSEN.L vs. CWEU.LXSEN.L vs. NCLP.LXSEN.L vs. EXUS.LXSEN.L vs. RNRU.LXSEN.L vs. ESIE.L
Often compared with INRG.L:
INRG.L vs. ICLNINRG.L vs. TANINRG.L vs. RENW.DEINRG.L vs. V3AB.LINRG.L vs. ACESINRG.L vs. ESIH.LINRG.L vs. RENG.L

Return for Risk

XSEN.L vs. INRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XSEN.L
XSEN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XSEN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
INRG.L
INRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
INRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
INRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
INRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
INRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSEN.L vs. INRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XSEN.LINRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.92
3.42

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.37
4.38

-2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.53

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

6.64

-3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

19.87

-11.29

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSEN.L vs. INRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSEN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the INRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSEN.L and INRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XSEN.LINRG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

3.42

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.11

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.50

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.02

+0.32

Drawdowns

XSEN.L vs. INRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSEN.L drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, smaller than the maximum INRG.L drawdown of -85.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSEN.L and INRG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XSEN.LINRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.46%

-85.09%

+22.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.55%

-12.38%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-44.29%

+21.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.04%

-57.38%

+33.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-65.47%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.31%

-27.35%

+18.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-56.54%

+38.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.32%

4.15%

+1.17%

Volatility

XSEN.L vs. INRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) is 9.04%, while iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) has a volatility of 9.58%. This indicates that XSEN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XSEN.LINRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.04%

9.58%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.50%

17.61%

+2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.79%

24.04%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.01%

24.80%

+1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.43%

25.33%

+4.10%

XSEN.L vs. INRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSEN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than INRG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSEN.L vs. INRG.L - Dividend Comparison

XSEN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than INRG.L's 1.09% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INRG.L
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		1.09%1.77%1.58%1.00%0.62%1.01%0.61%2.05%3.68%3.69%3.65%3.90%
XSEN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D		2.08%2.70%2.70%3.24%3.69%3.27%7.11%2.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XSEN.L and INRG.L have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSEN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSEN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INRG.L.

XSEN.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while INRG.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSEN.L and 0.65% for INRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSEN.L and INRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer