XSEM.TO vs. XUSR.TO
XSEM.TO (iShares ESG Aware MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF) and XUSR.TO (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSEM.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Morningstar EM GR CAD, while XUSR.TO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSEM.TO returned 8.61%/yr vs 13.66%/yr for XUSR.TO. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XSEM.TO charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for XUSR.TO.
Performance
XSEM.TO vs. XUSR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XSEM.TO having a 22.30% return and XUSR.TO slightly higher at 22.90%.
XSEM.TO
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- 6M
- 16.72%
- YTD
- 22.30%
- 1Y
- 37.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.76%
XUSR.TO
- 1D
- 4.61%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 23.58%
- YTD
- 22.90%
- 1Y
- 26.60%
- 3Y*
- 24.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$278.16K | CA$314.48K | CA$405.50K | |
| CA$650.37K | CA$647.51K | CA$526.95K |
XSEM.TO vs. XUSR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSEM.TO iShares ESG Aware MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF | 22.30% | 27.51% | 14.79% | 7.01% | -17.30% | -3.60% | 30.57% |
XUSR.TO iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF | 22.90% | 9.23% | 32.46% | 29.28% | -17.20% | 24.47% | 27.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSEM.TO and XUSR.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2020 | 0.47 |
The correlation between XSEM.TO and XUSR.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSEM.TO vs. XUSR.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSEM.TO
XUSR.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
XSEM.TO
XUSR.TO
Financial Services
XSEM.TO
XUSR.TO
Communication Services
XSEM.TO
XUSR.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XSEM.TO
XUSR.TO
Industrials
XSEM.TO
XUSR.TO
Basic Materials
XSEM.TO
XUSR.TO
Healthcare
XSEM.TO
XUSR.TO
Consumer Defensive
XSEM.TO
XUSR.TO
Energy
XSEM.TO
XUSR.TO
Utilities
XSEM.TO
XUSR.TO
Real Estate
XSEM.TO
XUSR.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSEM.TO vs. XUSR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XSEM.TO
XUSR.TO
XSEM.TO vs. XUSR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XSEM.TO) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSEM.TO | XUSR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.25 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 2.32 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.30 | 6.50 | +1.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSEM.TO vs. XUSR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, which is greater than XUSR.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSEM.TO and XUSR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSEM.TO | XUSR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.09% | -31.17% | -5.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.82% | -11.52% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.18% | -23.01% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.59% | -31.17% | -1.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.67% | -1.53% | -5.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.06% | -7.86% | -5.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.48% | 4.10% | +0.38% |
Volatility
XSEM.TO vs. XUSR.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XSEM.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.15% compared to iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO) at 7.29%. This indicates that XSEM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUSR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSEM.TO | XUSR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.15% | 7.29% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.47% | 15.78% | +6.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.54% | 19.31% | +5.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 20.41% | -2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 23.92% | -4.96% |
XSEM.TO vs. XUSR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSEM.TO has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than XUSR.TO's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSEM.TO vs. XUSR.TO - Dividend Comparison
XSEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than XUSR.TO's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSEM.TO iShares ESG Aware MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF | 1.53% | 1.78% | 2.08% | 1.10% | 2.25% | 2.45% | 1.14% | 2.41% |
XUSR.TO iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.69% | 0.93% | 1.01% | 0.66% | 0.34% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSEM.TO and XUSR.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUSR.TO is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUSR.TO is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for XSEM.TO.
XSEM.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XUSR.TO is Large Cap Growth Equities. XSEM.TO tracks Morningstar EM GR CAD, while XUSR.TO tracks MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for XSEM.TO and 0.23% for XUSR.TO.
Find the right allocation for XSEM.TO and XUSR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer