PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XSEA.TO vs. XDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XSEA.TO vs. XDIV.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XSEA.TO (iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE Index ETF) and XDIV.TO (iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSEA.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD, while XDIV.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSEA.TO returned 10.75%/yr vs 16.42%/yr for XDIV.TO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSEA.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for XDIV.TO.

Performance

XSEA.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XSEA.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSEA.TO achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 19.17% return.

XSEA.TO

1D
-0.55%
1M
5.39%
YTD
9.71%
6M
9.76%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
—

XDIV.TO

1D
0.19%
1M
3.65%
YTD
19.17%
6M
18.94%
1Y
38.61%
3Y*
22.97%
5Y*
16.42%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSEA.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XSEA.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE Index ETF		9.71%23.72%11.92%15.28%-8.97%11.09%6.08%8.09%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF		19.17%24.92%19.56%11.71%0.29%32.25%-7.81%9.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XSEA.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2019

0.47

The correlation between XSEA.TO and XDIV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.48 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSEA.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XSEA.TO
XDIV.TO

Financial Services

25.3%
46.7%

Industrials

16.6%

-

Technology

12.0%
1.3%

Healthcare

9.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%

-

Basic Materials

4.7%

-

Communication Services

3.8%
0.4%

Energy

3.1%
28.8%

Utilities

2.8%
11.3%

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Financial Services

XSEA.TO
25.3%
XDIV.TO
46.7%

Industrials

XSEA.TO
16.6%
XDIV.TO

-

Technology

XSEA.TO
12.0%
XDIV.TO
1.3%

Healthcare

XSEA.TO
9.3%
XDIV.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

XSEA.TO
7.5%
XDIV.TO
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

XSEA.TO
6.3%
XDIV.TO

-

Basic Materials

XSEA.TO
4.7%
XDIV.TO

-

Communication Services

XSEA.TO
3.8%
XDIV.TO
0.4%

Energy

XSEA.TO
3.1%
XDIV.TO
28.8%

Utilities

XSEA.TO
2.8%
XDIV.TO
11.3%

Real Estate

XSEA.TO
1.7%
XDIV.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE Index ETF

iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF

Often compared with XSEA.TO:
XSEA.TO vs. XDSR.TOXSEA.TO vs. XSEM.TOXSEA.TO vs. XSUS.TOXSEA.TO vs. ESGDXSEA.TO vs. XAW.TOXSEA.TO vs. XEU.TOXSEA.TO vs. XEQT.TO
Often compared with XDIV.TO:
XDIV.TO vs. VDY.TOXDIV.TO vs. XEI.TOXDIV.TO vs. XDV.TOXDIV.TO vs. XEQT.TOXDIV.TO vs. HDIV.TOXDIV.TO vs. XIU.TOXDIV.TO vs. CDZ.TO

Return for Risk

XSEA.TO vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XSEA.TO
XSEA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XSEA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSEA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSEA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XSEA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSEA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO
XDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSEA.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XSEA.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XSEA.TOXDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.50
4.94

-3.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.16
7.29

-5.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

2.03

-0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

16.64

-14.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.13

56.55

-49.41

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSEA.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSEA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSEA.TO and XDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XSEA.TOXDIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

4.94

-3.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

1.57

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.81

-0.19

Drawdowns

XSEA.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSEA.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, smaller than the maximum XDIV.TO drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSEA.TO and XDIV.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XSEA.TOXDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-41.30%

+12.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.99%

-2.33%

-9.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.50%

-10.53%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.70%

-17.60%

-10.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-0.09%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-4.25%

-1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

0.69%

+2.32%

Volatility

XSEA.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XSEA.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) at 2.81%. This indicates that XSEA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XSEA.TOXDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

2.81%

+2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.18%

6.36%

+5.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

7.85%

+6.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.64%

10.53%

+5.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.87%

16.01%

+0.86%

XSEA.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSEA.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSEA.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

XSEA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than XDIV.TO's 3.28% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF		3.28%3.81%4.29%4.20%3.95%3.58%4.58%4.02%4.85%1.82%
XSEA.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE Index ETF		2.21%2.43%2.90%2.64%2.35%2.12%1.40%2.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XSEA.TO and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for XSEA.TO.

XSEA.TO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. XSEA.TO tracks Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD, while XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for XSEA.TO and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSEA.TO and XDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer