XSDR.L vs. XCX5.L
XSDR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and XCX5.L (Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XSDR.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XCX5.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSDR.L returned 7.09%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for XCX5.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSDR.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XCX5.L.
Performance
XSDR.L vs. XCX5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSDR.L achieves a -2.48% return, which is significantly higher than XCX5.L's -12.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XSDR.L having a 7.09% annualized return and XCX5.L not far ahead at 7.44%.
XSDR.L
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- -2.48%
- 6M
- -1.52%
- 1Y
- 7.47%
- 3Y*
- 2.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
XCX5.L
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -12.70%
- 6M
- -12.76%
- 1Y
- -12.07%
- 3Y*
- 2.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
XSDR.L vs. XCX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSDR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | -2.48% | 9.44% | 0.30% | 6.92% | 0.28% | 17.06% | 4.29% | 23.70% | 0.84% | 8.44% |
XCX5.L Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -12.70% | -5.16% | 11.92% | 12.56% | 2.33% | 26.19% | 9.49% | 2.58% | -3.56% | 24.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSDR.L and XCX5.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2010 | 0.35 |
The correlation between XSDR.L and XCX5.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (3 years) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSDR.L vs. XCX5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSDR.L
XCX5.L
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
XSDR.L
XCX5.L
Basic Materials
XSDR.L
-
XCX5.L
Communication Services
XSDR.L
-
XCX5.L
Consumer Cyclical
XSDR.L
-
XCX5.L
Consumer Defensive
XSDR.L
-
XCX5.L
Energy
XSDR.L
-
XCX5.L
Financial Services
XSDR.L
-
XCX5.L
Industrials
XSDR.L
-
XCX5.L
Real Estate
XSDR.L
-
XCX5.L
Technology
XSDR.L
-
XCX5.L
Utilities
XSDR.L
-
XCX5.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSDR.L vs. XCX5.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSDR.L
XCX5.L
XSDR.L vs. XCX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSDR.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSDR.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.89 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | -0.60 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.31 | -1.37 | +2.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSDR.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | -0.76 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.26 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.37 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.23 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
XSDR.L vs. XCX5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSDR.L drawdown since its inception was -25.61%, smaller than the maximum XCX5.L drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSDR.L and XCX5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSDR.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.61% | -41.74% | +16.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.31% | -19.88% | +6.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.61% | -26.47% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.61% | -26.47% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.61% | -37.35% | +11.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.70% | -23.06% | +11.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -11.04% | +5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.68% | 8.81% | -3.13% |
Volatility
XSDR.L vs. XCX5.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSDR.L) is 5.64%, while Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that XSDR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCX5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSDR.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 6.39% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | 13.26% | -1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.23% | 15.78% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 15.92% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 19.89% | -4.04% |
XSDR.L vs. XCX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSDR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XCX5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSDR.L vs. XCX5.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSDR.L nor XCX5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XSDR.L and XCX5.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSDR.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSDR.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XCX5.L.
XSDR.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XCX5.L is Asia Pacific Equities. XSDR.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XCX5.L tracks MSCI India NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSDR.L and 0.75% for XCX5.L.
Find the right allocation for XSDR.L and XCX5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer