PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSCS.L vs. IUCS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSCS.L vs. IUCS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSCS.L is traded in GBp, while IUCS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUCS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XSCS.L having a 7.09% return and IUCS.L slightly lower at 6.79%.


XSCS.L

1D
0.17%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
7.09%
6M
6.80%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
5.68%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*

IUCS.L

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
6.79%
6M
6.25%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSCS.L vs. IUCS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSCS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D
7.09%-3.23%16.15%-5.00%11.79%19.16%5.49%22.78%11.73%
IUCS.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
6.79%-3.44%16.32%-5.36%11.82%19.26%4.87%23.28%9.53%

Correlation

The correlation between XSCS.L and IUCS.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018

0.87

The correlation between XSCS.L and IUCS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSCS.L vs. IUCS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSCS.L
IUCS.L

Consumer Defensive

99.0%
99.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
1.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

XSCS.L
99.0%
IUCS.L
99.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XSCS.L
1.0%
IUCS.L
1.0%

Basic Materials

XSCS.L

-

IUCS.L

-

Communication Services

XSCS.L

-

IUCS.L

-

Energy

XSCS.L

-

IUCS.L

-

Financial Services

XSCS.L

-

IUCS.L

-

Healthcare

XSCS.L

-

IUCS.L

-

Industrials

XSCS.L

-

IUCS.L

-

Real Estate

XSCS.L

-

IUCS.L

-

Technology

XSCS.L

-

IUCS.L

-

Utilities

XSCS.L

-

IUCS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSCS.L vs. IUCS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSCS.L
XSCS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XSCS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSCS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSCS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XSCS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSCS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

IUCS.L
IUCS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
IUCS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUCS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUCS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
IUCS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUCS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSCS.L vs. IUCS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSCS.LIUCS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.05

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

0.34

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.02

0.82

+0.20

XSCS.L vs. IUCS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSCS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is comparable to the IUCS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSCS.L and IUCS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSCS.LIUCS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

0.22

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.56

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.50

+0.21

Drawdowns

XSCS.L vs. IUCS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSCS.L drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum IUCS.L drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSCS.L and IUCS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSCS.LIUCS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-17.74%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-9.20%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.68%

-11.51%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.94%

-13.49%

+0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.09%

-7.25%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-4.69%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

3.86%

-0.08%

Volatility

XSCS.L vs. IUCS.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) have volatilities of 6.46% and 6.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSCS.LIUCS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.46%

6.19%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.77%

12.11%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

14.66%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.38%

14.12%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.40%

15.92%

-1.52%

XSCS.L vs. IUCS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSCS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IUCS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSCS.L vs. IUCS.L - Dividend Comparison

XSCS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, while IUCS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IUCS.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSCS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D
1.95%2.11%2.15%2.20%2.96%1.95%2.99%2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XSCS.L and IUCS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XSCS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSCS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUCS.L.

XSCS.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while IUCS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSCS.L and 0.15% for IUCS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSCS.L and IUCS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer