XSCS.L vs. SMH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH).

XSCS.L and SMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSCS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both XSCS.L and SMH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XSCS.L vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XSCS.L vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XSCS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D	7.76%	-3.23%	16.15%	-5.00%	11.79%	19.16%	5.49%	22.78%	11.73%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	10.64%	38.54%	41.53%	64.71%	-25.63%	43.48%	50.97%	58.19%	-0.50%

Different Trading Currencies

XSCS.L is traded in GBp, while SMH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSCS.L achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 8.48% return.

XSCS.L

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -6.51%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 6M: 9.04%
• 1Y: 2.28%
• 3Y*: 5.58%
• 5Y*: 8.82%
• 10Y*: —

SMH

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -4.36%
• YTD: 8.48%
• 6M: 17.49%
• 1Y: 76.88%
• 3Y*: 40.18%
• 5Y*: 26.72%
• 10Y*: 32.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSCS.L vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSCS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

SMH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

XSCS.L

Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D

Return for Risk

XSCS.L vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSCS.L

XSCS.L Risk / Return Rank: 15
XSCS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
XSCS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
XSCS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 14
XSCS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
XSCS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 15

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 95
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSCS.L vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XSCS.L	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	2.10	-1.94
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.34	2.72	-2.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.38	-0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.31	5.24	-4.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.64	17.89	-17.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSCS.L vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSCS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSCS.L and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XSCS.L	SMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17	2.10	-1.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.81	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.75	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between XSCS.L and SMH is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

XSCS.L vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

XSCS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than SMH's 0.28% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XSCS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D	1.94%	2.11%	2.15%	2.20%	2.96%	1.95%	2.99%	2.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.28%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Drawdowns

XSCS.L vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSCS.L drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -47.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSCS.L and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSCS.L	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.91%	-84.96%	+70.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.91%	-15.95%	+8.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.94%	-45.30%	+32.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.51%	-8.02%	+1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.09%	-41.35%	+37.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.78%	4.47%	-0.69%

Volatility

XSCS.L vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L) is 4.90%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 10.70%. This indicates that XSCS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSCS.L	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	10.70%	-5.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.13%	23.28%	-13.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.75%	36.78%	-23.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.08%	33.22%	-20.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.29%	31.65%	-17.36%