IUCS.L vs. XDWS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L).
IUCS.L and XDWS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUCS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. It was launched on Mar 20, 2017. XDWS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Mar 9, 2016. Both IUCS.L and XDWS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IUCS.L vs. XDWS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IUCS.L vs. XDWS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUCS.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 6.50% | 3.96% | 14.33% | -0.38% | -0.06% | 18.15% | 9.27% | 27.30% | -9.43% | 6.19% |
XDWS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C | 3.70% | 9.31% | 5.69% | 1.96% | -5.24% | 12.84% | 7.75% | 22.32% | -10.10% | 9.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUCS.L achieves a 6.50% return, which is significantly higher than XDWS.L's 3.70% return.
IUCS.L
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -7.57%
- YTD
- 6.50%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- 5.80%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWS.L
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -7.20%
- YTD
- 3.70%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 6.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.81%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUCS.L vs. XDWS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUCS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWS.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IUCS.L vs. XDWS.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUCS.L
XDWS.L
IUCS.L vs. XDWS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUCS.L | XDWS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 0.48 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 0.75 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.10 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 0.65 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.39 | 1.81 | -0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUCS.L | XDWS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.48 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.47 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.49 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between IUCS.L and XDWS.L is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IUCS.L vs. XDWS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUCS.L nor XDWS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IUCS.L vs. XDWS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUCS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.90%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWS.L drawdown of -23.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUCS.L and XDWS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUCS.L | XDWS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.90% | -23.72% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.95% | -9.74% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.20% | -17.53% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.00% | -8.58% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -4.15% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 3.52% | +0.20% |
Volatility
IUCS.L vs. XDWS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L) have volatilities of 4.77% and 4.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IUCS.L | XDWS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 4.59% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.32% | 9.30% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 13.40% | +1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 11.92% | +1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 12.40% | +2.54% |