PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSCD.L vs. XDWT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSCD.L vs. XDWT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSCD.L is traded in GBp, while XDWT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDWT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSCD.L achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly lower than XDWT.L's 24.60% return.


XSCD.L

1D
0.47%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
0.19%
1Y
13.60%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*

XDWT.L

1D
-1.87%
1M
14.96%
YTD
24.60%
6M
22.74%
1Y
52.87%
3Y*
29.51%
5Y*
22.68%
10Y*
25.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSCD.L vs. XDWT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XSCD.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D
-0.15%-1.95%35.07%37.43%-32.18%23.87%47.03%
XDWT.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
24.60%13.70%36.24%47.09%-23.22%31.09%36.97%

Correlation

The correlation between XSCD.L and XDWT.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2020

0.43

XSCD.L vs. XDWT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSCD.L
XDWT.L

Consumer Cyclical

97.8%

-

Communication Services

1.2%
0.6%

Technology

0.8%
99.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Industrials

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

XSCD.L
97.8%
XDWT.L

-

Communication Services

XSCD.L
1.2%
XDWT.L
0.6%

Technology

XSCD.L
0.8%
XDWT.L
99.1%

Basic Materials

XSCD.L

-

XDWT.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XSCD.L

-

XDWT.L

-

Energy

XSCD.L

-

XDWT.L
0.1%

Financial Services

XSCD.L

-

XDWT.L
0.1%

Healthcare

XSCD.L

-

XDWT.L
0.1%

Industrials

XSCD.L

-

XDWT.L
0.3%

Real Estate

XSCD.L

-

XDWT.L

-

Utilities

XSCD.L

-

XDWT.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSCD.L vs. XDWT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSCD.L
XSCD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XSCD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWT.L
XDWT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSCD.L vs. XDWT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSCD.LXDWT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.43

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

3.13

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.86

7.96

-4.11

XSCD.L vs. XDWT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSCD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSCD.L and XDWT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSCD.LXDWT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

2.60

-1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

1.00

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

1.16

-0.38

Drawdowns

XSCD.L vs. XDWT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSCD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, which is greater than XDWT.L's maximum drawdown of -27.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSCD.L and XDWT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSCD.LXDWT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-27.95%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.94%

-16.79%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.07%

-27.95%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.70%

-27.95%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.97%

-2.32%

-3.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.89%

-5.64%

-6.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.30%

6.62%

+5.68%

Volatility

XSCD.L vs. XDWT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L) is 5.38%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that XSCD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSCD.LXDWT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

7.48%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.78%

15.35%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.17%

20.26%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.69%

22.66%

+4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.89%

21.96%

+7.93%

XSCD.L vs. XDWT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSCD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWT.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSCD.L vs. XDWT.L - Dividend Comparison

XSCD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, while XDWT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
XDWT.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSCD.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D
0.45%0.44%0.40%0.60%0.88%0.36%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSCD.L and XDWT.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSCD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSCD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWT.L.

XSCD.L is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XDWT.L is Technology Equities. XSCD.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while XDWT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSCD.L and 0.25% for XDWT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSCD.L and XDWT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer