XRT vs. XLI
XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) and XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XRT is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P Retail Select Industry, while XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRT returned 9.52%/yr vs 14.15%/yr for XLI. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLI.
Performance
XRT vs. XLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRT achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly lower than XLI's 13.90% return. Over the past 10 years, XRT has underperformed XLI with an annualized return of 9.52%, while XLI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.15% annualized return.
XRT
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 9.14%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 17.43%
- 3Y*
- 12.80%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
XLI
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 13.90%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 25.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
XRT vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 3.14% | 8.07% | 11.78% | 21.53% | -31.64% | 42.60% | 41.91% | 14.12% | -8.04% | 4.22% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 13.90% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRT and XLI is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.70 |
The correlation between XRT and XLI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
XRT vs. XLI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XRT
XLI
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
XRT
XLI
Consumer Defensive
XRT
XLI
-
Communication Services
XRT
XLI
-
Technology
XRT
XLI
Energy
XRT
XLI
-
Healthcare
XRT
XLI
-
Basic Materials
XRT
-
XLI
-
Financial Services
XRT
-
XLI
-
Industrials
XRT
-
XLI
Real Estate
XRT
-
XLI
-
Utilities
XRT
-
XLI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRT vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank
XRT
XLI
XRT vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRT | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.26 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 1.98 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.48 | 7.82 | -5.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRT vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than XLI's maximum drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and XLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRT | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.81% | -62.26% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -12.21% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.62% | -18.49% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.57% | -21.64% | -22.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.02% | -42.33% | -4.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.32% | -1.24% | -8.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.99% | -9.20% | -5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.92% | 3.09% | +2.83% |
Volatility
XRT vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) is 5.73%, while Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that XRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRT | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 6.22% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.90% | 13.59% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.59% | 16.17% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.91% | 17.55% | +9.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 20.04% | +7.13% |
XRT vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLI's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRT vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison
XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than XLI's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 0.79% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.40% | 2.15% | 1.55% | 1.01% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.52% | 1.36% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRT and XLI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLI has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to XRT (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRT dropped -65.81% vs XLI's -62.26%.
On 10-year performance, XLI leads with 14.15% vs 9.52% for XRT. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XRT has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLI has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XRT.
XLI has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.79% for XRT.
XRT is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XLI is Industrials Equities. XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry, while XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XRT and 0.08% for XLI.
XLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XRT and XLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer