PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRT vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRT vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRT achieves a -1.99% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, XRT has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 8.56%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.


XRT

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
-1.99%
6M
-2.00%
1Y
8.44%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
8.56%

GLD

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
2.92%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
31.09%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRT vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
-1.99%8.07%11.78%21.53%-31.64%42.60%41.91%14.12%-8.04%4.22%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
2.92%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XRT and GLD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006

-0.01

The correlation between XRT and GLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.12 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XRT vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRT
GLD

Consumer Cyclical

73.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

20.9%

-

Communication Services

1.4%

-

Healthcare

1.4%

-

Technology

1.4%

-

Energy

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

XRT
73.6%
GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

XRT
20.9%
GLD

-

Communication Services

XRT
1.4%
GLD

-

Healthcare

XRT
1.4%
GLD

-

Technology

XRT
1.4%
GLD

-

Energy

XRT
1.4%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

XRT

-

GLD
100.0%

Financial Services

XRT

-

GLD

-

Industrials

XRT

-

GLD

-

Real Estate

XRT

-

GLD

-

Utilities

XRT

-

GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRT vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRT
XRT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRT vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRTGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.24

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

1.68

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.45

4.15

-2.71

XRT vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRT and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRTGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

1.21

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

1.01

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.83

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.60

-0.26

Drawdowns

XRT vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRTGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.81%

-45.56%

-20.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-19.21%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.62%

-19.21%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.57%

-21.03%

-23.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.02%

-22.00%

-25.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.82%

-17.75%

+3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.00%

-16.16%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.85%

7.73%

-1.88%

Volatility

XRT vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.51%. This indicates that XRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRTGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

5.51%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.63%

23.16%

-9.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.42%

26.61%

-6.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.90%

18.00%

+8.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.16%

15.95%

+11.21%

XRT vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRT vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
0.83%0.77%1.52%1.40%2.15%1.55%1.01%1.57%1.51%1.52%1.36%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRT and GLD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XRT has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to GLD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRT dropped -65.81% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs 8.56% for XRT. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 8.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

XRT is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while GLD is Gold. XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XRT and 0.40% for GLD.

GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRT and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer