XRT vs. AWAY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) and AWAY (ETFMG Travel Tech ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - XRT tracks the S&P Retail Select Industry while AWAY tracks the Prime Travel Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XRT returned -0.91%/yr vs -10.70%/yr for AWAY. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AWAY.

Performance

XRT vs. AWAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRT achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly higher than AWAY's -15.46% return.

XRT

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 4.15%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: -0.21%
• 1Y: 12.05%
• 3Y*: 12.88%
• 5Y*: -0.91%
• 10Y*: 9.25%

AWAY

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: 6.45%
• YTD: -15.46%
• 6M: -15.99%
• 1Y: -14.67%
• 3Y*: 1.28%
• 5Y*: -10.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRT vs. AWAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF	1.06%	8.07%	11.78%	21.53%	-31.64%	42.60%	44.78%
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF	-15.46%	-3.36%	10.44%	17.94%	-32.25%	-5.91%	3.47%

Correlation

The correlation between XRT and AWAY is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2020	0.64

The correlation between XRT and AWAY shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XRT vs. AWAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XRT	AWAY
Consumer Cyclical	76.5%	64.2%
Consumer Defensive	19.2%	-
Communication Services	1.5%	4.4%
Technology	1.4%	29.0%
Energy	1.3%	-
Healthcare	1.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Industrials	-	1.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XRT vs. AWAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRT

XRT Risk / Return Rank: 19
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 17
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 19

AWAY

AWAY Risk / Return Rank: 4
AWAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
AWAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
AWAY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
AWAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
AWAY Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRT vs. AWAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRT	AWAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	-0.66	+1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	-0.81	+1.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.91	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.89	-0.45	+1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.02	-0.85	+2.88

XRT vs. AWAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the AWAY Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRT and AWAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XRT vs. AWAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than AWAY's maximum drawdown of -56.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and AWAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRT	AWAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.81%	-56.57%	-9.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.53%	-32.83%	+19.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.62%	-32.83%	+7.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.57%	-51.49%	+6.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.14%	-49.00%	+37.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.99%	-36.32%	+21.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.97%	17.21%	-11.24%

Volatility

XRT vs. AWAY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) is 6.36%, while ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that XRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRT	AWAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.36%	7.03%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.34%	18.51%	-4.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.60%	22.44%	-1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.93%	26.89%	+0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.19%	31.74%	-4.55%

XRT vs. AWAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AWAY's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRT vs. AWAY - Dividend Comparison

XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, while AWAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF	0.79%	0.77%	1.52%	1.40%	2.15%	1.55%	1.01%	1.57%	1.51%	1.52%	1.36%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRT and AWAY in my portfolio?

XRT and AWAY have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XRT or AWAY?

AWAY has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to XRT (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRT dropped -65.81% vs AWAY's -56.57%.

Which ETF is better, XRT or AWAY?

On 5-year performance, XRT leads with -0.91% vs -10.70% for AWAY. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XRT has been the lower-risk option at 6.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XRT or AWAY?

Over the 5-year period, XRT has performed better with a -0.91% return vs -10.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRT or AWAY?

XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AWAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRT or AWAY?

XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.00% for AWAY.

What is the main difference between XRT and AWAY?

XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry, while AWAY tracks Prime Travel Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XRT and 0.75% for AWAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.