XRPZ vs. BLKC
XRPZ (Franklin XRP ETF) and BLKC (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF) are both Blockchain funds - XRPZ tracks the CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant while BLKC tracks the Alerian Galaxy Global Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index. Both are passively managed. Their -0.15 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. XRPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BLKC.
Performance
XRPZ vs. BLKC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XRPZ
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- -44.24%
- YTD
- -41.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BLKC
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | $2.62M | $2.73M | $3.51M |
XRPZ vs. BLKC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | -24.74% |
BLKC Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF | 0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPZ and BLKC is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPZ vs. BLKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ) and Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPZ vs. BLKC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPZ | BLKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.80% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.90% | — | — |
Volatility
XRPZ vs. BLKC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPZ | BLKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.70% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.70% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.70% | — | — |
XRPZ vs. BLKC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BLKC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPZ vs. BLKC - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRPZ nor BLKC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPZ and BLKC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BLKC.
XRPZ and BLKC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
XRPZ tracks CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while BLKC tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XRPZ and 0.60% for BLKC.
Find the right allocation for XRPZ and BLKC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer