PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BLKC vs. BLOK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BLKC and BLOK is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

BLKC vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
44.44%
47.95%
BLKC
BLOK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BLKC:

1.71

BLOK:

1.77

Sortino Ratio

BLKC:

2.41

BLOK:

2.40

Omega Ratio

BLKC:

1.29

BLOK:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

BLKC:

1.69

BLOK:

1.62

Martin Ratio

BLKC:

8.22

BLOK:

8.58

Ulcer Index

BLKC:

7.62%

BLOK:

8.31%

Daily Std Dev

BLKC:

36.04%

BLOK:

39.93%

Max Drawdown

BLKC:

-72.75%

BLOK:

-73.33%

Current Drawdown

BLKC:

-3.22%

BLOK:

-4.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLKC achieves a 9.46% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 13.73% return.


BLKC

YTD

9.46%

1M

3.44%

6M

44.43%

1Y

53.74%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BLOK

YTD

13.73%

1M

6.18%

6M

47.97%

1Y

61.58%

5Y*

24.82%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BLKC vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLKC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.


BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
Expense ratio chart for BLOK: current value at 0.71% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.71%
Expense ratio chart for BLKC: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLKC vs. BLOK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLKC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLKC is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLKC is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLKC is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLKC is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLKC is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLKC is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLOK is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLOK is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLOK is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLOK is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLOK is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLOK is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BLKC vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BLKC, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.711.77
The chart of Sortino ratio for BLKC, currently valued at 2.40, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.412.40
The chart of Omega ratio for BLKC, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.291.29
The chart of Calmar ratio for BLKC, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.691.62
The chart of Martin ratio for BLKC, currently valued at 8.22, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.228.58
BLKC
BLOK

The current BLKC Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLKC and BLOK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.71
1.77
BLKC
BLOK

Dividends

BLKC vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

BLKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.96%, more than BLOK's 5.27% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
BLKC
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF
17.96%19.65%1.92%5.40%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
5.27%6.00%1.15%0.00%14.31%1.88%2.05%1.30%

Drawdowns

BLKC vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLKC drawdown since its inception was -72.75%, roughly equal to the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLKC and BLOK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-3.22%
-4.65%
BLKC
BLOK

Volatility

BLKC vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC) is 9.33%, while Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a volatility of 11.60%. This indicates that BLKC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
9.33%
11.60%
BLKC
BLOK
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab