BLKC vs. BLOK
BLKC (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF) and BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) are both Blockchain funds. BLKC is passively managed, while BLOK is actively managed. Their -0.10 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BLKC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BLOK.
Performance
BLKC vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BLKC
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BLOK
- 1D
- -5.45%
- 1M
- -10.79%
- 6M
- -11.65%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 1Y
- -3.74%
- 3Y*
- 33.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.08M | $11.21M | $19.66M |
BLKC vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BLKC Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF | 0.34% |
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 5.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLKC and BLOK is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLKC vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank
BLKC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BLOK
BLKC vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLKC | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.02 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLKC vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLKC | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -73.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -35.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -23.52% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -25.87% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.19% | — |
Volatility
BLKC vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLKC | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 39.73% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 42.41% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 39.01% | — |
BLKC vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLKC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLKC vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison
BLKC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLKC Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 0.87% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLKC and BLOK have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLKC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLKC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BLOK.
BLOK has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for BLKC.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BLKC and 0.70% for BLOK.
Find the right allocation for BLKC and BLOK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer