XRPT vs. ISCMF
XRPT (Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPT is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. XRPT is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. Over the past year, XRPT returned -93.84% vs 22.55% for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. XRPT charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
XRPT vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPT achieves a -74.94% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 11.96% return.
XRPT
- 1D
- 8.69%
- 1M
- -7.04%
- 6M
- -80.96%
- YTD
- -74.94%
- 1Y
- -93.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.88%
- 6M
- 11.96%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPT vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF | -74.94% | -67.94% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 11.96% | 12.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPT and ISCMF is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPT vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
XRPT
ISCMF
XRPT vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRPT | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.84 | -1.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 1.66 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 6.83 | -8.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPT vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPT drawdown since its inception was -96.33%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPT and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPT | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.33% | -25.42% | -70.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.33% | -13.68% | -82.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.77% | -13.68% | -82.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.88% | -13.31% | -52.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 76.76% | 3.31% | +73.45% |
Volatility
XRPT vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) has a higher volatility of 35.72% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 9.30%. This indicates that XRPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPT | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.72% | 9.30% | +26.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 103.57% | 18.12% | +85.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 146.09% | 19.58% | +126.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 147.77% | 14.83% | +132.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 147.77% | 14.83% | +132.94% |
XRPT vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPT vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
XRPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF | 6.34% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPT and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XRPT has higher volatility (35.72%) compared to ISCMF (9.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRPT dropped -96.33% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.
On 1-year performance, ISCMF leads with 22.55% vs -93.84% for XRPT. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 9.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 22.55% return vs -93.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for XRPT.
XRPT has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
XRPT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for XRPT and 0.19% for ISCMF.
ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XRPT and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer