XRPT vs. BTRN
XRPT (Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. XRPT is actively managed, while BTRN is passively managed. Over the past year, XRPT returned -88.46% vs -17.28% for BTRN. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRPT charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTRN.
Performance
XRPT vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPT achieves a -70.47% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -9.20% return.
XRPT
- 1D
- -4.67%
- 1M
- -33.40%
- YTD
- -70.47%
- 6M
- -78.42%
- 1Y
- -88.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -13.54%
- YTD
- -9.20%
- 6M
- -9.80%
- 1Y
- -17.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPT vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF | -70.47% | -67.83% |
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -9.20% | -14.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPT and BTRN is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2025 | 0.62 |
The correlation between XRPT and BTRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPT vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank
XRPT
BTRN
XRPT vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRPT | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.85 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.69 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | -1.17 | -0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRPT | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 | -0.88 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.60 | 0.00 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
XRPT vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPT drawdown since its inception was -95.02%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPT and BTRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPT | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.02% | -36.97% | -58.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.02% | -25.29% | -69.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.02% | -25.22% | -69.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.11% | -14.43% | -48.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.46% | 14.76% | +55.70% |
Volatility
XRPT vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison
Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) has a higher volatility of 27.84% compared to Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) at 6.93%. This indicates that XRPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPT | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.84% | 6.93% | +20.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 104.32% | 10.35% | +93.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 150.33% | 19.84% | +130.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 149.19% | 30.94% | +118.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 149.19% | 30.94% | +118.25% |
XRPT vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than BTRN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPT vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison
XRPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, less than BTRN's 30.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 30.57% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF | 5.26% | 1.23% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPT and BTRN have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XRPT has higher volatility (27.84%) compared to BTRN (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRPT dropped -95.02% vs BTRN's -36.97%.
On 1-year performance, BTRN leads with -17.28% vs -88.46% for XRPT. On fees, XRPT is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 6.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTRN has performed better with a -17.28% return vs -88.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XRPT is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.
BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 30.57%, compared with 5.26% for XRPT.
They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for XRPT and 0.95% for BTRN.
XRPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XRPT and BTRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer