XRPM vs. SILJ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XRPM (Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPM is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. XRPM is actively managed, while SILJ is passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRPM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.

Performance

XRPM vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF (XRPM) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRPM achieves a -37.18% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's 7.05% return.

XRPM

• 1D: -2.28%
• 1M: -16.11%
• YTD: -37.18%
• 6M: -43.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SILJ

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 3.93%
• YTD: 7.05%
• 6M: 17.56%
• 1Y: 109.13%
• 3Y*: 47.92%
• 5Y*: 13.22%
• 10Y*: 9.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRPM vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XRPM Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF	-37.18%	-13.48%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	7.05%	26.02%

Correlation

The correlation between XRPM and SILJ is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

XRPM vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILJ

SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 55
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRPM vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF (XRPM) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XRPM	SILJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.04	0.09	-1.13

Drawdowns

XRPM vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRPM drawdown since its inception was -46.50%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPM and SILJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRPM	SILJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.50%	-79.04%	+32.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.71%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.47%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.50%	-26.50%	-20.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.98%	-41.43%	+14.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	14.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XRPM	SILJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.44%	54.90%	+10.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	65.44%	44.33%	+21.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.44%	46.23%	+19.21%

XRPM vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRPM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRPM vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

XRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.17%, more than SILJ's 1.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	1.87%	2.00%	7.26%	0.01%	0.05%	0.36%	1.23%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.52%	2.46%
XRPM Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF	26.17%	3.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRPM and SILJ in my portfolio?

XRPM and SILJ have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XRPM or SILJ?

On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRPM or SILJ?

SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XRPM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRPM or SILJ?

XRPM has the higher dividend yield at 26.17%, compared with 1.87% for SILJ.

What is the main difference between XRPM and SILJ?

XRPM is categorized as Derivative Income, while SILJ is Silver. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPM and 0.69% for SILJ.