XRPM vs. QDVO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

XRPM (Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF) and QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Amplify. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRPM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for QDVO.

Performance

XRPM vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF (XRPM) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRPM achieves a -42.52% return, which is significantly lower than QDVO's 5.23% return.

XRPM

• 1D: -3.65%
• 1M: -19.48%
• YTD: -42.52%
• 6M: -43.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDVO

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -3.88%
• YTD: 5.23%
• 6M: 3.94%
• 1Y: 19.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRPM vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XRPM Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF	-42.52%	-12.80%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	5.23%	1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between XRPM and QDVO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.52

Return for Risk

XRPM vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRPM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QDVO

QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 46
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 47
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRPM vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF (XRPM) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRPM	QDVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.53	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.13	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.89	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.31	—

Drawdowns

XRPM vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRPM drawdown since its inception was -51.05%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPM and QDVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRPM	QDVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.05%	-17.75%	-33.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.05%	-5.07%	-45.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.60%	-2.42%	-26.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XRPM	QDVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.47%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.52%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.91%	12.67%	+53.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	65.91%	17.52%	+48.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.91%	17.52%	+48.39%

XRPM vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRPM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRPM vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

XRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.60%, more than QDVO's 10.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	10.56%	9.92%	2.79%
XRPM Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF	28.60%	3.12%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRPM and QDVO in my portfolio?

XRPM and QDVO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XRPM or QDVO?

On fees, QDVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRPM or QDVO?

QDVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XRPM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRPM or QDVO?

XRPM has the higher dividend yield at 28.60%, compared with 10.56% for QDVO.

What is the main difference between XRPM and QDVO?

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPM and 0.56% for QDVO.