XRPC vs. BFJL

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

XRPC (Canary XRP ETF) and BFJL (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Canary Capital, while BFJL is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRPC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFJL.

Performance

XRPC vs. BFJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canary XRP ETF (XRPC) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRPC achieves a -39.69% return, which is significantly lower than BFJL's -4.85% return.

XRPC

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -3.46%
• 6M: -47.09%
• YTD: -39.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BFJL

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 3.02%
• 6M: -6.00%
• YTD: -4.85%
• 1Y: -15.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRPC vs. BFJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XRPC Canary XRP ETF	-39.69%	-26.96%
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July	-4.85%	-6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between XRPC and BFJL is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

XRPC vs. BFJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRPC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BFJL

BFJL Risk / Return Rank: 2
BFJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BFJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BFJL Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BFJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BFJL Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRPC vs. BFJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary XRP ETF (XRPC) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRPC	BFJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-1.09	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.46	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.82	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.68	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.95	—

Drawdowns

XRPC vs. BFJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRPC drawdown since its inception was -58.81%, which is greater than BFJL's maximum drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPC and BFJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRPC	BFJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.81%	-21.27%	-37.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-21.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.95%	-18.79%	-37.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.74%	-12.58%	-25.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	15.09%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XRPC	BFJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.98%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.69%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.02%	13.25%	+61.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.02%	13.22%	+61.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.02%	13.22%	+61.80%

XRPC vs. BFJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRPC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BFJL's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRPC vs. BFJL - Dividend Comparison

XRPC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.

Position	TTM	2025
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July	1.42%	1.35%
XRPC Canary XRP ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRPC and BFJL in my portfolio?

XRPC and BFJL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XRPC or BFJL?

On fees, XRPC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRPC or BFJL?

XRPC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRPC or BFJL?

BFJL has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.00% for XRPC.

What is the main difference between XRPC and BFJL?

XRPC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFJL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Canary Capital and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XRPC and 0.90% for BFJL.