PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRP vs. BCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRP vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise XRP ETF (XRP) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRP achieves a -34.50% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 26.68% return.


XRP

1D
-1.54%
1M
-14.12%
YTD
-34.50%
6M
-45.52%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCI

1D
-0.12%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
26.68%
6M
25.55%
1Y
38.68%
3Y*
15.96%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRP vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XRP
Bitwise XRP ETF
-34.50%-8.64%
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
26.68%2.37%

Correlation

The correlation between XRP and BCI is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRP vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRP

BCI
BCI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRP vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise XRP ETF (XRP) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRP vs. BCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRPBCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.83

0.48

-1.31

Drawdowns

XRP vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRP drawdown since its inception was -48.71%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRP and BCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRPBCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.71%

-32.69%

-16.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.21%

-4.52%

-43.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.70%

-12.00%

-17.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

Volatility

XRP vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRPBCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.13%

16.92%

+58.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.13%

16.82%

+58.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.13%

15.65%

+59.48%

XRP vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRP has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRP vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

XRP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.01%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
13.01%16.49%3.29%3.93%19.98%19.43%0.68%1.47%1.13%5.02%
XRP
Bitwise XRP ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRP and BCI have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for XRP.

BCI has the higher dividend yield at 13.01%, compared with 0.00% for XRP.

XRP is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for XRP and 0.25% for BCI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRP and BCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer