XRMI vs. THTA
XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) and THTA (SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. XRMI is passively managed, while THTA is actively managed. Over the past year, XRMI returned 9.48% vs 16.78% for THTA. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRMI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for THTA.
Performance
XRMI vs. THTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRMI achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than THTA's 6.86% return.
XRMI
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 9.48%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THTA
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 16.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRMI vs. THTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 1.75% | 4.60% | 15.18% | 2.05% |
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF | 6.86% | -10.24% | 7.31% | 1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRMI and THTA is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRMI vs. THTA — Risk / Return Rank
XRMI
THTA
XRMI vs. THTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRMI | THTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.78 | 2.91 | -1.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | 4.29 | -1.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.75 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 6.39 | -4.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.70 | 52.08 | -44.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRMI | THTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 2.91 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.08 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
XRMI vs. THTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRMI drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum THTA drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRMI and THTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRMI | THTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -31.41% | +16.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.02% | -2.64% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -6.79% | +6.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.94% | -7.52% | +1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 0.32% | +0.91% |
Volatility
XRMI vs. THTA - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) has a higher volatility of 0.89% compared to SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA) at 0.75%. This indicates that XRMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRMI | THTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 0.75% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.21% | 4.00% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.39% | 5.80% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.91% | 20.25% | -13.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.91% | 20.25% | -13.34% |
XRMI vs. THTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than THTA's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRMI vs. THTA - Dividend Comparison
XRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.62%, more than THTA's 11.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF | 11.26% | 12.66% | 12.44% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.62% | 12.35% | 11.86% | 12.62% | 12.84% | 2.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRMI and THTA have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XRMI has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to THTA (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRMI dropped -15.31% vs THTA's -31.41%.
On 1-year performance, THTA leads with 16.78% vs 9.48% for XRMI. On fees, THTA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, THTA has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, THTA has performed better with a 16.78% return vs 9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
THTA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XRMI.
XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.62%, compared with 11.26% for THTA.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and SoFi. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XRMI and 0.49% for THTA.
THTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XRMI and THTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer