PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRMI vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRMI vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRMI achieves a 3.42% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -7.27% return.


XRMI

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.27%
6M
2.67%
YTD
3.42%
1Y
9.91%
3Y*
6.85%
5Y*
10Y*

SHLD

1D
-0.61%
1M
-5.92%
6M
-22.32%
YTD
-7.27%
1Y
-0.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRMI vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
3.42%4.60%15.18%-0.39%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-7.27%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XRMI and SHLD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.31

XRMI vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRMI
SHLD

Technology

37.7%
12.2%

Financial Services

12.1%

-

Communication Services

9.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%

-

Healthcare

9.3%

-

Industrials

7.9%
87.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Energy

3.0%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Technology

XRMI
37.7%
SHLD
12.2%

Financial Services

XRMI
12.1%
SHLD

-

Communication Services

XRMI
9.9%
SHLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

XRMI
9.5%
SHLD

-

Healthcare

XRMI
9.3%
SHLD

-

Industrials

XRMI
7.9%
SHLD
87.8%

Consumer Defensive

XRMI
4.7%
SHLD

-

Energy

XRMI
3.0%
SHLD

-

Utilities

XRMI
2.7%
SHLD

-

Basic Materials

XRMI
1.9%
SHLD

-

Real Estate

XRMI
1.9%
SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRMI vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRMI vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XRMISHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.01

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

-0.03

+2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

-0.08

+8.07

XRMI vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRMI and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XRMI vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRMI drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRMI and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRMISHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-25.40%

+10.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-25.40%

+20.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-22.99%

+22.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-3.90%

-1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

10.30%

-9.06%

Volatility

XRMI vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) is 1.10%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that XRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRMISHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

8.28%

-7.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.41%

19.79%

-15.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.54%

25.12%

-19.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.87%

21.54%

-14.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.87%

21.54%

-14.67%

XRMI vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRMI vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

XRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.51%, more than SHLD's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.71%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%0.00%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.51%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRMI and SHLD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to XRMI (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRMI dropped -15.31% vs SHLD's -25.40%.

On 1-year performance, XRMI leads with 9.91% vs -0.87% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XRMI has performed better with a 9.91% return vs -0.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XRMI.

XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.51%, compared with 0.71% for SHLD.

XRMI is categorized as Derivative Income, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. XRMI tracks Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XRMI and 0.50% for SHLD.

XRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRMI and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer