PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRMI vs. GOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRMI vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRMI achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than GOOY's 13.61% return.


XRMI

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.38%
YTD
1.75%
6M
2.96%
1Y
9.48%
3Y*
6.71%
5Y*
10Y*

GOOY

1D
-0.65%
1M
-5.16%
YTD
13.61%
6M
11.36%
1Y
88.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRMI vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
1.75%4.60%15.18%-2.53%
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
13.61%53.95%12.58%-3.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XRMI and GOOY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRMI vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOY
GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRMI vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRMIGOOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.65

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

5.50

-3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.70

21.08

-13.38

XRMI vs. GOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the GOOY Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRMI and GOOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRMIGOOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

3.84

-2.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.09

-0.72

Drawdowns

XRMI vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRMI drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRMI and GOOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRMIGOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-24.40%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-16.15%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-8.61%

+8.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.94%

-6.26%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

4.20%

-2.97%

Volatility

XRMI vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) is 0.89%, while YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that XRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRMIGOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

6.90%

-6.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.21%

17.19%

-12.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.39%

23.19%

-17.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.91%

23.31%

-16.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.91%

23.31%

-16.40%

XRMI vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRMI vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison

XRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.62%, less than GOOY's 50.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
50.99%41.50%36.74%7.90%0.00%0.00%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.62%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRMI and GOOY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOY has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to XRMI (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRMI dropped -15.31% vs GOOY's -24.40%.

On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 88.26% vs 9.48% for XRMI. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 88.26% return vs 9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 50.99%, compared with 12.62% for XRMI.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XRMI and 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRMI and GOOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer