PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRMI vs. BUYW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRMI vs. BUYW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRMI achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than BUYW's 4.70% return.


XRMI

1D
-0.23%
1M
1.52%
6M
2.46%
YTD
3.15%
1Y
9.55%
3Y*
6.84%
5Y*
10Y*

BUYW

1D
0.14%
1M
1.34%
6M
4.27%
YTD
4.70%
1Y
9.27%
3Y*
8.66%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRMI vs. BUYW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
3.15%4.60%15.18%4.22%-3.75%
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
4.70%9.08%9.82%12.80%1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between XRMI and BUYW is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2022

0.46

XRMI vs. BUYW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRMI
BUYW

Technology

37.7%
26.6%

Financial Services

12.1%
14.5%

Communication Services

9.9%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
6.4%

Healthcare

9.3%
13.0%

Industrials

7.9%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
3.0%

Energy

3.0%
12.7%

Utilities

2.7%
1.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.9%

Technology

XRMI
37.7%
BUYW
26.6%

Financial Services

XRMI
12.1%
BUYW
14.5%

Communication Services

XRMI
9.9%
BUYW
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XRMI
9.5%
BUYW
6.4%

Healthcare

XRMI
9.3%
BUYW
13.0%

Industrials

XRMI
7.9%
BUYW
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

XRMI
4.7%
BUYW
3.0%

Energy

XRMI
3.0%
BUYW
12.7%

Utilities

XRMI
2.7%
BUYW
1.2%

Basic Materials

XRMI
1.9%
BUYW
1.0%

Real Estate

XRMI
1.9%
BUYW
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRMI vs. BUYW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

BUYW
BUYW Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BUYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUYW Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BUYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUYW Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRMI vs. BUYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XRMIBUYWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

3.60

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.69

19.17

-11.48

XRMI vs. BUYW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the BUYW Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRMI and BUYW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XRMI vs. BUYW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRMI drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, which is greater than BUYW's maximum drawdown of -9.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRMI and BUYW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRMIBUYWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-9.36%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-2.59%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.34%

-9.36%

+1.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

0.00%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-0.59%

-5.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

0.48%

+0.76%

Volatility

XRMI vs. BUYW - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) have volatilities of 1.41% and 1.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRMIBUYWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

1.35%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.41%

3.90%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.57%

4.86%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.88%

8.39%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.88%

8.39%

-1.51%

XRMI vs. BUYW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BUYW's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRMI vs. BUYW - Dividend Comparison

XRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.54%, more than BUYW's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
5.88%5.89%5.93%5.95%0.50%0.00%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.54%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRMI and BUYW have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XRMI has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to BUYW (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRMI dropped -15.31% vs BUYW's -9.36%.

On 3-year performance, BUYW leads with 8.66% vs 6.84% for XRMI. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BUYW has performed better with a 8.66% return vs 6.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BUYW.

XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.54%, compared with 5.88% for BUYW.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Main Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XRMI and 1.29% for BUYW.

BUYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRMI and BUYW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer