XRLX vs. LEXI
XRLX (FundX Conservative ETF) and LEXI (Alexis Practical Tactical ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XRLX returned 17.90% vs 29.19% for LEXI. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XRLX charges 1.63%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for LEXI.
Performance
XRLX vs. LEXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRLX achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly lower than LEXI's 13.13% return.
XRLX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 7.85%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- 17.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LEXI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 13.13%
- 6M
- 13.75%
- 1Y
- 29.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRLX vs. LEXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XRLX FundX Conservative ETF | 7.85% | 7.85% | 17.61% | 7.14% |
LEXI Alexis Practical Tactical ETF | 13.13% | 19.23% | 16.51% | 10.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRLX and LEXI is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between XRLX and LEXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
XRLX vs. LEXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XRLX
LEXI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
XRLX
LEXI
Financial Services
XRLX
LEXI
Communication Services
XRLX
LEXI
Consumer Cyclical
XRLX
LEXI
Industrials
XRLX
LEXI
Healthcare
XRLX
LEXI
Consumer Defensive
XRLX
LEXI
Energy
XRLX
LEXI
Utilities
XRLX
LEXI
Basic Materials
XRLX
LEXI
Real Estate
XRLX
LEXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRLX vs. LEXI — Risk / Return Rank
XRLX
LEXI
XRLX vs. LEXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Conservative ETF (XRLX) and Alexis Practical Tactical ETF (LEXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRLX | LEXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.22 | 2.76 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.18 | 3.94 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.51 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 3.61 | -0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.92 | 17.41 | -4.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRLX | LEXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 2.76 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.41 | 0.78 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
XRLX vs. LEXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRLX drawdown since its inception was -15.33%, smaller than the maximum LEXI drawdown of -22.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRLX and LEXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRLX | LEXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -22.01% | +6.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.28% | -8.12% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -0.17% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -5.19% | +3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 1.68% | -0.29% |
Volatility
XRLX vs. LEXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FundX Conservative ETF (XRLX) is 2.59%, while Alexis Practical Tactical ETF (LEXI) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that XRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRLX | LEXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 3.07% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.65% | 8.79% | -2.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.10% | 10.64% | -2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.05% | 14.64% | -3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.05% | 14.64% | -3.59% |
XRLX vs. LEXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRLX has a 1.63% expense ratio, which is higher than LEXI's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRLX vs. LEXI - Dividend Comparison
XRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than LEXI's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEXI Alexis Practical Tactical ETF | 0.83% | 0.94% | 2.17% | 1.34% | 0.95% | 0.23% |
XRLX FundX Conservative ETF | 2.57% | 2.77% | 1.66% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, XRLX and LEXI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LEXI has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to XRLX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRLX dropped -15.33% vs LEXI's -22.01%.
On 1-year performance, LEXI leads with 29.19% vs 17.90% for XRLX. On fees, LEXI is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, XRLX has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LEXI has performed better with a 29.19% return vs 17.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LEXI is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.63% for XRLX.
XRLX has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.83% for LEXI.
They also come from different issuers: FundX and Alexis. Their fees differ too: 1.63% for XRLX and 1.00% for LEXI.
LEXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XRLX and LEXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer